Saturday Beyers - Page 5

philcski · #81 07-11-2010, 02:56 PM

http://www.entertonement.com/clips/l...ohn-G-Brennan-

#82 07-11-2010, 02:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cmorioles

I'm going to need a good cry. Please, don't be so harsh.

That wouldn't be funny if it weren't so true. Hence the philscki banning debacle.

I've witnessed some pretty pathetic butthurt on the internet in the past 15 or so years and that is definitely top 5 material.

cmorioles · #83 07-11-2010, 03:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coach Pants

That wouldn't be funny if it weren't so true. Hence the philscki banning debacle.

I've witnessed some pretty pathetic butthurt on the internet in the past 15 or so years and that is definitely top 5 material.

I don't know this, but I'm going to guess you are banned at PA as well? Am I warm?

#84 07-11-2010, 03:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cmorioles

I don't know this, but I'm going to guess you are banned at PA as well? Am I warm?

I had an account I trolled with a few years ago that was darted but it was used purely for the politics forum...you know the one where he eats and s.hits at when he's on those late night tilts?

philcski · #85 07-11-2010, 03:05 PM

The crazy thing about this is I don't even care about getting banned over there. To put it in perspective- I had posted maybe 100 times, total, versus what 7,000+ here?

Also, for full disclosure, I told PA to ban me if he thought it was ban-able to not like someone, even the owner, and express it elsewhere (not nearly as strongly as CJ reported it to be). I had never once posted anything inflammatory over there. The strongest comment was calling poster "Tom" "right wing and narrow minded" which is akin to calling Tiger Woods a "player".

cmorioles · #86 07-11-2010, 03:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coach Pants

I had an account I trolled with a few years ago that was darted but it was used purely for the politics forum...you know the one where he eats and s.hits at when he's on those late night tilts?

No, I don't go into politics. I figured you were banned. You should apply for a moderator position. It doesn't pay anything, but it beats changing the grease on the deep fryer.

#87 07-11-2010, 03:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cmorioles

No, I don't go into politics. I figured you were banned. You should apply for a moderator position. It doesn't pay anything, but it beats changing the grease on the deep fryer.

How about you pick my application up? Shouldn't take you too long with those 9 minute miles, Prefontaine.

herkhorse · #88 07-11-2010, 03:09 PM

Steven H. Crist, I missed a race reading this s.hit. lol

cmorioles · #89 07-11-2010, 03:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coach Pants

How about you pick my application up? Shouldn't take you too long with those 9 minute miles, Prefontaine.

I sure will. I'm no Prefontaine, but I do ok for a 43 year old fat guy. I'm sure you are quite the athlete.

#90 07-11-2010, 03:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cmorioles

I sure will. I'm no Prefontaine, but I do ok for a 43 year old fat guy. I'm sure you are quite the athlete.

Ok it's a few 100 miles but look on the bright side...you'll be skinny when you get here.

RockHardTen1985 · #91 07-11-2010, 03:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cmorioles

I would assume by now Phil will spend some quiet time reflecting on recent events. What other possible response could there be to RHT and CP coming to your defense?

I was stating facts. I have read the **** he posts, I have pm'd him about taking **** down and he blames you, so that makes you both clowns. The pm's I posted, are those lies? Am I lying about reading his **** late at night?

#92 07-11-2010, 03:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RockHardTen1985

I was stating facts. I have read the **** he posts, I have pm'd him about taking **** down and he blames you, so that makes you both clowns. The pm's I posted, are those lies? Am I lying about reading his **** late at night?

Your language is offensive! I'm telling the mods at TVG!

cmorioles · #93 07-11-2010, 03:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RockHardTen1985

I was stating facts. I have read the **** he posts, I have pm'd him about taking **** down and he blames you, so that makes you both clowns. The pm's I posted, are those lies? Am I lying about reading his **** late at night?

You jumped to these conclusions from those PMs? This is saying a lot, but you may be dumber than Coach Pants.

#94 07-11-2010, 03:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cmorioles

You jumped to these conclusions from those PMs? This is saying a lot, but you may be dumber than Coach Pants.

^^

cmorioles · #95 07-11-2010, 03:30 PM

Now that CP has capitulated and RHT is giving out throwouts in the Sunday play around thread, maybe we can get back to the Beyers.

What should Blind Luck get, and why? Phil says 115, but I'm sure even he knows deep down that is absurd. I think it might be a few points low at 94, but no more than that.

RockHardTen1985 · #96 07-11-2010, 03:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cmorioles

Now that CP has capitulated and RHT is giving out throwouts in the Sunday play around thread, maybe we can get back to the Beyers.

What should Blind Luck get, and why? Phil says 115, but I'm sure even he knows deep down that is absurd. I think it might be a few points low at 94, but no more than that.

Dont blame this one on me, this thread took a horrible turn before I said anything.

#97 07-11-2010, 03:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cmorioles

Now that CP has capitulated and RHT is giving out throwouts in the Sunday play around thread, maybe we can get back to the Beyers.

What should Blind Luck get, and why? Phil says 115, but I'm sure even he knows deep down that is absurd. I think it might be a few points low at 94, but no more than that.

I'm worrying about philcski's personal life at the moment.

herkhorse · #98 07-11-2010, 03:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RockHardTen1985

Dont blame this one on me, this thread took a horrible turn before I said anything.

philcski · #99 07-11-2010, 04:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cmorioles

Now that CP has capitulated and RHT is giving out throwouts in the Sunday play around thread, maybe we can get back to the Beyers.

What should Blind Luck get, and why? Phil says 115, but I'm sure even he knows deep down that is absurd. I think it might be a few points low at 94, but no more than that.

I said give the number whatever the right number by the difference in time is. I just did the Beyers for the card by the book and here's what I got. Left out the off the turf allowance at 9F and the 5F last race.

R1 STR 12.5K 1 Mi 70y 77
R2 MCL 10K 6F 50
R3 STR 5K 1 Mi 16th 72
R4 CLM 5K N3L 6F 69
R5 MCL 10K 6F 57
R6 CLM 5K N3L 6F 63
R7 Barbaro Stakes 1 Mi 16th 90
R9 Delaware Oaks 1 Mi 16th 110
R10 Sussex Stakes (off turf) 1 Mi 16th 87

cmorioles · #**100** 07-11-2010, 04:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philcski

I said give the number whatever the right number by the difference in time is. I just did the Beyers for the card by the book and here's what I got. Left out the off the turf allowance at 9F and the 5F last race.

R1 STR 12.5K 1 Mi 70y 77
R2 MCL 10K 6F 50
R3 STR 5K 1 Mi 16th 72
R4 CLM 5K N3L 6F 69
R5 MCL 10K 6F 57
R6 CLM 5K N3L 6F 63
R7 Barbaro Stakes 1 Mi 16th 90
R9 Delaware Oaks 1 Mi 16th 110
R10 Sussex Stakes (off turf) 1 Mi 16th 87

Cool. I'll post mine tomorrow and see what the differences are, and we can go from there if there are any.