Regardless, History is being made.

[richard burch]

Originally Posted by Rudeboyelvis

Belgium Party Leader endorses Donald Trump (not reactionary; endorsement occurred before the most recent attacks):

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pnjx58S0Oc0

I will say it for Donald....


WE LOVE BELGIUM!!!!!

[GenuineRisk]

http://www.vox.com/2016/3/25/1130348...andrew-jackson

[richard burch]

Message from Mr. Donald J. Trump.....New York..You are welcome.




VICTORY!!!!!!!!! You lose Cruz!

[richard burch]

Goodbye Ted!. Nice knowin Ya!


ON TO VICTORY!!!!!



Hey! Cancel those Fiorina V.P. business cards. She won't be needing them.

[Danzig]

Trump has got to be the worst candidate for president in our history. Just appalling.

[bigrun]

Originally Posted by Danzig

Trump has got to be the worst candidate for president in our history. Just appalling.

You can say that again

Originally Posted by Danzig

Trump has got to be the worst candidate for president in our history. Just appalling.

[Pants II]

I hope big goy gets red-pilled so hard they never look at newspaper political cartoons again.

I'm hopeful, but not delusional. I'm talking about the same ****** who just agreed with the fattest person on DT that Trump is a worse Presidential Candidate than Romney.

I hope he wins in a historic landslide and you both lose the ability to type.

Can't stop this train, dumb goys.

[Pants II]

The only way Hillary wins is if every illegal and felon votes twice.

That's your only hope and you'll probably get your wish and support it.

Because you're stupid, fat white people. Real dumb. Dumbest whites I've been around on the internet, in fact.

[Pants II]

Bob Dole
Michael Dukakis
John McCain

I mean we can go on all day. Both parties.

Can't stump us. You made this bed and you're going to lie in it. Fleas and all.

[jms62]

I would say someone whose party is supposed to be for the people whose family has made hundreds of millions since leaving office from the fat cats that party should be protecting these same people from is a worse candidate. A candidate whose husbands DISASTOROUS trade deals have all but destroyed the middle class as a worse candidate. Voters thinking that this candidate will change things that have made her family obscenely wealthy are the worst voters in any election.

[Pants II]

And lets not forget well known playboy J. Kerry who married a woman for her wealth and influence.

It's amazing how someone can be worse than him (especially through a woman's eyes).

There is nothing much worse than a male mooch.

[Rileyoriley]

Originally Posted by jms62

I would say someone whose party is supposed to be for the people whose family has made hundreds of millions since leaving office from the fat cats that party should be protecting these same people from is a worse candidate. A candidate whose husbands DISASTOROUS trade deals have all but destroyed the middle class as a worse candidate. Voters thinking that this candidate will change things that have made her family obscenely wealthy are the worst voters in any election.

[Pants II]

Mark Cuban on FBN just said it will be an election about nothing because Trump won't go into details (policy) and he's absolutely right.

Hillary will try to talk policy but her record will be used against her so it will fail and then it will just be "woman card/sjw" failed propaganda and "build that wall/crooked Hillary" trollfest to a nation of pissed off people.

Advantage DJT

[GenuineRisk]

Originally Posted by jms62

I would say someone whose party is supposed to be for the people whose family has made hundreds of millions since leaving office from the fat cats that party should be protecting these same people from is a worse candidate. A candidate whose husbands DISASTOROUS trade deals have all but destroyed the middle class as a worse candidate. Voters thinking that this candidate will change things that have made her family obscenely wealthy are the worst voters in any election.

You mean NAFTA? NAFTA that George Bush Sr. created with Canada and Mexico? That NAFTA? The one that Republican Congresscritters overwhelmingly voted for NAFTA? That NAFTA?

The NAFTA that Clinton openly says hasn't delivered what it promised?

It's easy to look back on NAFTA with 20 years of hindsight and say, "This was terrible" but are we sure we'd be in a better place without it? Our employment issues run much deeper than a trade agreement. We depended for decades on being the only developed nation that didn't get bombed to smithereens in WW2. We got to dominate trade because we were the only country that still had infrastructure. It was naive to think other nations wouldn't catch back up.

Which is to say, I don't know what the solution is. Our culture believes that a company's first obligation is to return money to shareholders, and however that happens is just fine. If we lived in a nation that believed a company's first obligation was to sustain a local community, maybe things would be different, but that's not our culture and it's unlikely to change anytime soon.

I do find it interesting that Dems regularly get blamed for policies that end up hurting American workers, while Republican elected officials get a free pass, despite the fact that the Republicans are the ones overwhelmingly voting in favor of these policies. It's a fascinating disconnect.

Also, it's interesting that it's totally fine with Americans that someone be born extremely wealthy and spend their career indulging in deals that harm the average American (see Trump hiring illegal immigrants to construct his buildings and Trump Sr. taking gov't handouts and then using them to block black folk from getting housing - Woody Guthrie actually wrote songs about how much he hated "Old Man Trump"), but when a Democrat rises from middle-class to very rich (or, in the case of Bill, from dirt poor to very rich), somehow it's an affront to American principles.

Maybe, deep down, America really wants to be an aristocracy.

[Pants II]

9 Democrats are in the Senate currently who voted for NAFTA

While 8 Republicans are still there.

So you can blame it on the Republicans all you'd like when it was the dems who really owned the House. I mean owned it.

Your ilk are done. Your false left-right paradigm is done. Your extremist leader is almost done.

It's over. We've put up with over 7 years of your nonsense. You let the radicals in your tent bully the rest of us to the point that about all of us are out of hibernation and angry and hungry as all get out.

That rapist signed it. With help from a democratic house. 103 said sure why not.

I repeat your little paradigm is over.

[jms62]

Originally Posted by GenuineRisk

You mean NAFTA? NAFTA that George Bush Sr. created with Canada and Mexico? That NAFTA? The one that Republican Congresscritters overwhelmingly voted for NAFTA? That NAFTA?

The NAFTA that Clinton openly says hasn't delivered what it promised?

It's easy to look back on NAFTA with 20 years of hindsight and say, "This was terrible" but are we sure we'd be in a better place without it? Our employment issues run much deeper than a trade agreement. We depended for decades on being the only developed nation that didn't get bombed to smithereens in WW2. We got to dominate trade because we were the only country that still had infrastructure. It was naive to think other nations wouldn't catch back up.

Which is to say, I don't know what the solution is. Our culture believes that a company's first obligation is to return money to shareholders, and however that happens is just fine. If we lived in a nation that believed a company's first obligation was to sustain a local community, maybe things would be different, but that's not our culture and it's unlikely to change anytime soon.

I do find it interesting that Dems regularly get blamed for policies that end up hurting American workers, while Republican elected officials get a free pass, despite the fact that the Republicans are the ones overwhelmingly voting in favor of these policies. It's a fascinating disconnect.

Also, it's interesting that it's totally fine with Americans that someone be born extremely wealthy and spend their career indulging in deals that harm the average American (see Trump hiring illegal immigrants to construct his buildings and Trump Sr. taking gov't handouts and then using them to block black folk from getting housing - Woody Guthrie actually wrote songs about how much he hated "Old Man Trump"), but when a Democrat rises from middle-class to very rich (or, in the case of Bill, from dirt poor to very rich), somehow it's an affront to American principles.

Maybe, deep down, America really wants to be an aristocracy.

Check Clinton's record on Worker Visa's and I'll accept your apology in advance. Good day.

[Rudeboyelvis]

Originally Posted by Pants II

9 Democrats are in the Senate currently who voted for NAFTA

While 8 Republicans are still there.

So you can blame it on the Republicans all you'd like when it was the dems who really owned the House. I mean owned it.

Your ilk are done. Your false left-right paradigm is done. Your extremist leader is almost done.

It's over. We've put up with over 7 years of your nonsense. You let the radicals in your tent bully the rest of us to the point that about all of us are out of hibernation and angry and hungry as all get out.

That rapist signed it. With help from a democratic house. 103 said sure why not.

I repeat your little paradigm is over.

Bingo

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by GenuineRisk

You mean NAFTA? NAFTA that George Bush Sr. created with Canada and Mexico? That NAFTA? The one that Republican Congresscritters overwhelmingly voted for NAFTA? That NAFTA?

The NAFTA that Clinton openly says hasn't delivered what it promised?

It's easy to look back on NAFTA with 20 years of hindsight and say, "This was terrible" but are we sure we'd be in a better place without it? Our employment issues run much deeper than a trade agreement. We depended for decades on being the only developed nation that didn't get bombed to smithereens in WW2. We got to dominate trade because we were the only country that still had infrastructure. It was naive to think other nations wouldn't catch back up.

Which is to say, I don't know what the solution is. Our culture believes that a company's first obligation is to return money to shareholders, and however that happens is just fine. If we lived in a nation that believed a company's first obligation was to sustain a local community, maybe things would be different, but that's not our culture and it's unlikely to change anytime soon.

I do find it interesting that Dems regularly get blamed for policies that end up hurting American workers, while Republican elected officials get a free pass, despite the fact that the Republicans are the ones overwhelmingly voting in favor of these policies. It's a fascinating disconnect.

Also, it's interesting that it's totally fine with Americans that someone be born extremely wealthy and spend their career indulging in deals that harm the average American (see Trump hiring illegal immigrants to construct his buildings and Trump Sr. taking gov't handouts and then using them to block black folk from getting housing - Woody Guthrie actually wrote songs about how much he hated "Old Man Trump"), but when a Democrat rises from middle-class to very rich (or, in the case of Bill, from dirt poor to very rich), somehow it's an affront to American principles.

Maybe, deep down, America really wants to be an aristocracy.

Blah blah blah

Trumps going to get us out of nato, nuke europe, and give nukes to japan. He is the MAN. And he is such a great businessman, that is why he only has the four bankruptcies.
Guy was born on third base, but would have folks believe he hit a triple.
Tells his reality show fans that the fault for their job losses is due to illegals and foreign workers...they dont pay attention to the fact he is one of those who hires them, instead of citizens. Buys policy, is one of the causes of our woes, but has managed to convince people that he is the solution when in fact he is one of the ones who has caused the problems.
Oh...and i just saw last night. Another big trump supporter announced his backing yesterday....kkk group in virginia. Makes me so proud.

[Danzig]

Just saw this...contains a lot of trump info. But, hey, if you are into racism, sexism, and xenophobia, he is the man.

Make 'murica great agin!!
https://www.yahoo.com/news/elizabeth...161957117.html

[bigrun]

Originally Posted by Danzig

Just saw this...contains a lot of trump info. But, hey, if you are into racism, sexism, and xenophobia, he is the man.

Make 'murica great agin!!
https://www.yahoo.com/news/elizabeth...161957117.html

From Fox news

A message for my fellow Republicans: If you back Trump you will not be trusted again'

Yet now, many Americans – from the public, to the media, to politicians in Washington, D.C. – seem to be acquiescing to the idea of a Donald Trump candidacy and presidency.

The entire country seems to be falling down the rabbit hole.

Donald Trump is unfit to be president of the United States for reasons almost too numerous to mention.

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2016/...-examined.html