![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#41
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#42
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#43
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#44
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#45
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Made a mistake to Kemp...Crushed it.
|
#46
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Joe Sheehan on the trade
"The trade ends up looking like one that made sense for both teams, given the expectations on each and each organization’s relative focus. The A’s are trying to build for 2010, while the Cubs are trying to not go 101 years without a championship. The A’s didn’t have much reason to bet on Harden’s upside, given the money owed to him and their chances of winning this year, while the Cubs not only have reason to, they were offered the pitcher for a price they could happily pay. Neither team is likely to lose this trade, and it seems clear that both could win it. That’s the definition of a good deal." |
#47
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Yea, but my problem lies in the expectations and overall focus of the A's management right now. Building for 2010? This didn't just start a couple years ago. They were surely using the excuse of building for 2008 when giving away other good players 2-5 years ago. If I really believed they were trying to get young talent together(to keep to one day get a ring,) then, believe me, I would buy into their stories. They have proven they are liars. This is why you see very few people in that green stadium, but the lil house across the bay is full every time you see a game on T.V. there. One has relative good will from the people of the bay area,and the other doesn't. The one with much fewer fans is the one who has won rings for the bay area, but they choose to pay to see the team with no rings, and the team with the consistently worse record. There is a reason for that. They know that if this Gallagher kid does get good, then the A's will trade him before they have to pay him. Why would fans be interested in seeing them trade their players just when they are getting good? Why couldn't they have held on to Harden, and seen how they do in 2009? That's what they did with Zito in 2006. Now, if they are decent in 2009, they won't have Harden to help them. Like I said, they almost seem to want to make sure they never have quite enough to contend with teams like the Angels. The Angels had to have a pretty crappy year in 2006 for the A's to beat them, and it took a God-like year from the combination of Thomas, Bradley, and the other leftfielder free agent hitter(can't think of his name, but they refused to pay him anything after that season.....anger control an issue with this one as well as Bradley.) Point is they don't seem to have made this trade to really accomplish anything (except stay young n' cheap, and hated by bay area fans.) You see a plan, and I see them doing nothing but the same bull that is keeping them from having enough to really compete with top teams in 2008. It's always gunna be 2 years in the future with this management. That's the claim 8 years ago, and it will be the same false claim as long as Billy is there. |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Hopefully he makes it to his 2nd start with the way you guys are talking |
#49
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#50
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Beane really solved ALOT of Hendry's problems becuase he was constantly asked why Murton/Patterson weren't producing, yadda yadda and now, Hendry gets to wash his hands of the BS. I don't even know if they were looking for another starter, the bullpen has been stressed alot lately because Pinella has had a short fuse so the addition of Guadin could be even more important then Harden. Last night was a perfect example. Score is 5 to 1 bottom 9, and he pulls Marmol and brings in Wood for one hitter. Now, if it were life or death, sure, pull him, but middle season games are not and I see no reason to bring in Wood in that situation, regardless if his arm is fine or not. Maybe I am just the ultimate pessamist because I personally think Wood is one pitch away from throwing his arm completely off. Why not leave Marmol in and let him fight his way through it. He doesn't give up many HR's and his stuff is electric, and he might get some confidence from getting through a trying situation. |
#51
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#52
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#53
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#54
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Because Beane and Di podesta are liar filth that destroy chemistry. We sent dat piece of Di Po garbage out of L.A. after he fkd our team up. Now he helped fck up San Diego. Beane hatched that fkn Demon. |
#55
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
#56
|
|||
|
|||
![]() First hitter Gaudin faces. Ball ends up in bleachers
|
#57
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Love it! Almost as good as Lilly not making it thru 3 innings against the Reds |
#58
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#59
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
How do you listen to Ron Santo on a regular basis? At first I found it funny to laugh at how ridiculous he is, but after a while he is unlistenable. We are spoiled with Uecker in Milwaukee. He is by far the best ever. |
#60
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Random thought, obviously i have seen the Brewers play alot of games, and it seems like they almost suffer sometimes when they have a good pitcher on the mound. Their coach needs to get them to focus better when Sheets/CC pitch, especially in the bullpen, can't believe they lost yesterday after the way sheets pitched... |