Street Sense not out of Belmont yet!

[letswastemoney]

http://www.drf.com/news/article/85117.html

[fpsoxfan]

I saw that article earlier. It would be interesting if the big three come back. I'd be quite surprised though. Also it might be a case of be careful what you wish for. Do we want a big field..which would be the case(as many as 12 I've heard) if one or two of the big three dont' show....or......do we want a smaller field with the big three being in...Am I making any sense?
Personally I would love to see a rematch....So does NYRA.

[letswastemoney]

Nobody is going to watch it if the big 3 don't come back.

Having a small field, but with the big 3, would be the best thing to happen as long as the horses all come out of the Preakness okay. I would love it as well.

[The Indomitable DrugS]

I just want Rags To Riches in the race.....

[fpsoxfan]

Originally Posted by The Indomitable

I just want Rags To Riches in the race.....

Would also be interesting....Why not? She'd make a good showing.

[MisterB]

Originally Posted by The Indomitable DrugS

I just want Rags To Riches in the race.....

I would point her to the Alabama, why go for the Belmont?

[The Indomitable DrugS]

Originally Posted by MisterB

why go for the Belmont?

Because she can win it.

[MisterB]

From no shot to all the shots

http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/showthread.php?t=10280

Originally Posted by MisterB

From no shot to all the shots

http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/showthread.php?t=10280

The funniest thing about that thread is seeing PG1985's signature.

[The Indomitable DrugS]

Originally Posted by Pillow Pants

The funniest thing about that thread is seeing PG1985's signature.

Yep.

I don't see what he was getting at with posting that thread either. It was late February, and I said there was no shot of R2R winning the Derby, because it was obvious she wouldn't run in the Derby.

Besides her, the 3-year-old filly division looked horrendous, so you obviously point for the Oaks with a filly who didn't break her maiden until her 3yo season.

[MisterB]

Originally Posted by The Indomitable DrugS

Yep.

I don't see what he was getting at with posting that thread either. It was late February, and I said there was no shot of R2R winning the Derby, because it was obvious she wouldn't run in the Derby.

Besides her, the 3-year-old filly division looked horrendous, so you obviously point for the Oaks with a filly who didn't break her maiden until her 3yo season.

Come on drugs, you had no faith in her at all. That's why I posted it. You came back on this tread and now are convinced she is the best. OK? Don't matter anyway.

I'm done here on this thread anyway.

[The Indomitable DrugS]

Originally Posted by MisterB

Come on drugs, you had no faith in her at all. That's why I posted it. You came back on this tread and now are convinced she is the best. OK? Don't matter anyway.

Saying "I had no faith in her" ---That's not true at all.

In fact, on another board, I said she'd win the Kentucky Oaks after her January maiden win this year.......however, I don't want to turn this thread into another 'DrugS thinks he's God' thread...contrary to how it really may appear, I haven't started a self promotion campaign lately. I'm not running for anything, nor trying to sell anything to anyone.

You started the thread with the question: "Can a Filly win the Derby tis year???"

Had I felt there was any chance she'd be in the gate on Derby day, I'd have answered differently.