Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > Main Forum > The Paddock
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 11-21-2006, 07:47 PM
Danzig Danzig is offline
Dee Tee Stables
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: The Natural State
Posts: 29,940
Default

so being part owner of a derby winner qualifies you to choose the best group to run new york racing?!
__________________
Books serve to show a man that those original thoughts of his aren't very new at all.
Abraham Lincoln
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 11-21-2006, 08:30 PM
oracle80
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Zieg I hear on the next committee they are gonna have the guy who owns Organizer, the horse who won the Empire Classic where Funny Cide was 4th.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 11-21-2006, 11:03 PM
ELA ELA is offline
Randwyck
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: NY/NJ
Posts: 1,293
Default

Here is my question -- would Jack Knowlton have been named to the committee had he not owned Funny Cide?

Eric
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 11-21-2006, 11:07 PM
blackthroatedwind blackthroatedwind is offline
Jerome Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 9,938
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ELA
Here is my question -- would Jack Knowlton have been named to the committee had he not owned Funny Cide?

Eric

Of course not.

However, he was probably way above the average as far as horse racing knowledge on that committee.

It is very sad for those of us that love this game, and genuinely care about racing in NY State, to see the shoddy treatment it receives from the State. The government isn't just happy with the money they take out of handle, they have to further insult as by filling pretty much any and all positions with the wives of donors.

At least we used to have Ben Liebman. Pataki took care of that.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 11-22-2006, 04:29 AM
repent repent is offline
Monmouth Park
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 823
Default

What everyone is failing to realize is that the committee means nothing. It is all political. The decision might go the same way but the people on the committee have no say in who is rewarded the franchise.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 11-22-2006, 07:53 AM
blackthroatedwind blackthroatedwind is offline
Jerome Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 9,938
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Minefield
What everyone is failing to realize is that the committee means nothing. It is all political. The decision might go the same way but the people on the committee have no say in who is rewarded the franchise.

Gee thanks. Nobody has pointed this out.

What some people fail to realize is how obvious " new " posters are.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 11-22-2006, 08:32 AM
philcski's Avatar
philcski philcski is offline
Goodwood
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Mission Viejo, CA
Posts: 8,872
Default

I'm sure the promise of a $100MM upfront had nothing to do with their selection.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 11-22-2006, 08:39 AM
oracle80
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by philcski
I'm sure the promise of a $100MM upfront had nothing to do with their selection.
Dude, this was a handpicked committee selected by folks who wanted to make sure NYRA didn't get the bid. That was basically the single biggest qualification to be placed on the committee, that teh members not support NYRA. Knowledge of the inner or obvious workings of the game was not a criteria in any way.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.