Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > Main Forum > The Paddock
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 05-21-2009, 09:07 PM
ateamstupid's Avatar
ateamstupid ateamstupid is offline
Super Mod.. and Super Fly
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 13,036
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cannon Shell
I am not saying that any of this is a negative for the sport but lets call him what he is, an egotistical billionaire who loves the spotlight.
Which is pretty much what I said. He's obviously an egomaniac, but to call what he did w/RA and Curlin "greedy" and "unsportsmanlike" is scary dumb.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 05-21-2009, 09:20 PM
Cannon Shell's Avatar
Cannon Shell Cannon Shell is offline
Sha Tin
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 20,855
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ateamstupid
Which is pretty much what I said. He's obviously an egomaniac, but to call what he did w/RA and Curlin "greedy" and "unsportsmanlike" is scary dumb.
yeah the greedy and unsportsmanlike are strange choices
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 05-26-2009, 08:27 AM
Ogygian's Avatar
Ogygian Ogygian is offline
Cahokia Downs
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Pa
Posts: 153
Default

Looks like I took a beating on this one, which is ok. I will try to explain the reasoning behind my opinions.
When I said the word "greed", it had nothing to do with finances at all, it had everything to do with breeding. I have to be honest, if I had not heard Hal Wiggins talk about Rachel and the plan he had already mapped out for her and the fact that he "liked" to have 5 weeks in between races I may not have been as pissed. In hindsight now we can say..."it was good for the game".
In my eyes it felt like he swooped in, bought her, rushed her back. He wasn't thinking at the time, "This will be good for the game" or "this is a great filly, Hal isn't testing her, let's buy her and test her". No he bought her with the sole intention of saying I am going to breed two Preakness winners together. She ran one heck of a race and he made the right decision...by the way everything is working out, my guess she will not run in the Belmont will have been correct, there is way to much back and forth going. And I still won't be surprised if a phantom injury pops up...
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 05-26-2009, 08:30 AM
Left Bank's Avatar
Left Bank Left Bank is offline
Fairgrounds
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Southern Canada
Posts: 1,579
Default

I don't think it is very sportsmanlike for what the ASS Mussen/Jackson camp is doing to Borel.Make your damn decision!! Stop leaving Calvin hanging.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 05-26-2009, 09:29 AM
Danzig Danzig is offline
Dee Tee Stables
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: The Natural State
Posts: 29,940
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Left Bank
I don't think it is very sportsmanlike for what the ASS Mussen/Jackson camp is doing to Borel.Make your damn decision!! Stop leaving Calvin hanging.
oh please...it's the nature of the game, and i seriously doubt calvin is complaining. he has the luxury of waiting. besides, if they say she's going, and then she has a lackluster work, they just cost borel a ride in the belmont as woolly would then find and name another jock.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 05-26-2009, 09:32 AM
Danzig Danzig is offline
Dee Tee Stables
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: The Natural State
Posts: 29,940
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ogygian
Looks like I took a beating on this one, which is ok. I will try to explain the reasoning behind my opinions.
When I said the word "greed", it had nothing to do with finances at all, it had everything to do with breeding. I have to be honest, if I had not heard Hal Wiggins talk about Rachel and the plan he had already mapped out for her and the fact that he "liked" to have 5 weeks in between races I may not have been as pissed. In hindsight now we can say..."it was good for the game".
In my eyes it felt like he swooped in, bought her, rushed her back. He wasn't thinking at the time, "This will be good for the game" or "this is a great filly, Hal isn't testing her, let's buy her and test her". No he bought her with the sole intention of saying I am going to breed two Preakness winners together. She ran one heck of a race and he made the right decision...by the way everything is working out, my guess she will not run in the Belmont will have been correct, there is way to much back and forth going. And I still won't be surprised if a phantom injury pops up...
if his sole intent in buying her was for breeding, she'd already be in the shed. as for a 'phantom injury'...i'm not quite sure where that's coming from. he may have had no choice but to run curlin, but he certainly showed no fear in doing so once he had no other option.

i can't believe i'm at all in the position of defending jess jackson... he had the wherewithal to buy the top filly in the country, quite possibly the top horse in the country. he likes her pedigree, he once tried to buy her sire and was unable to.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 05-27-2009, 10:39 AM
johnny pinwheel johnny pinwheel is offline
Woodbine
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: saratoga ny
Posts: 986
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sightseek
Taking a shot, when you could be proven wrong, I consider sporting.

Doing the same old thing like the Mosses with Zenyatta, not sporting.

Trying new things like Turf or running in the Classic when you're not terribly fond of the surface, but understand that the fans want to see it - sporting.

Scratching because of being highweighted like Frankel - not sporting.

Just because someone monetarily benefits from sporting actions doesn't make it any less sporting in my eyes.
i agree with this more than any of the crap about jackson. the original post is foolish. who cares about his ego or personal motives. what he does is GOOD for this game. he takes curlin, the horse of the year to the breeders cup on that poly crap knowing full well his horse is probably best but up against the surface. most would of stayed away. he puts up 10 million buys rachel and enters her in the preakness. biggest racing story this year. name one of these other knuckle heads that would of done it? this, at a time when racing needs stars. i noticed zenyatta scratched at CD. she probably stood no chance in the mud on a dirt track. we will never know because the connections took the safe bet and ran her on the cushion. this guy, jackson does not play "safe", he puts his money where his mouth is, which is more than i can say about most others. i am a gambler, not a chalk player and so is this guy. he is a throw back to the days where owners showed up no matter what to prove their horse is the fastest. most have lost sight of this and go for the easy stakes money/breeding dollar. its just one reason that the game suffers from lack of fan interest! here he offers the "buzz" of the year in our sport and people are dissing him. when these tracks start closing don't thank jess jackson for it !
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 05-27-2009, 12:06 PM
sumitas sumitas is offline
Santa Anita
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,362
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Linny
...
IfsRA really worth$10M (or was she 2 weeks ago)? Realistically, she is by a young sire with no BMS record. Her family is solid but hardly glamourous...
Rachel's 1-o family, 1925 Champion 2 year old filly Friar's Carse is the main reine de course, has produced many notable runners to this day . Maybe Rachel will add the glamour this family deserves . I confess that I am biased toward the 1-o family because of a certain muscular 2 year old colt I am fond of . If his 1-o family isn't glamorous then maybe his 5x6 Miss Disco fits the bill .

Besides Rachel, Song of Navarone and Caribbean Sunset are probably the biggest 1-o family stars today . In recent years Storm Song, Honey Ryder, High Cotton and Trust N Luck have added some glamour to the family .

Maybe Ogygian should add Sportin Man to his virtual stable .

Last edited by sumitas : 05-27-2009 at 01:03 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.