![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#22
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#23
|
||||
|
||||
![]() 50$ Cowboy Cal
10$ Etched 5$ Into Mischief/Maimonades 10$ Coal Play 10$ Double Down Vinman (my homer pick, no real shot at winning) 10$ Blackberry Road
__________________
"A person who saw no important difference between the fire outside a Neandrathal's cave and a working thermo-nuclear reactor might tell you that junk bonds and derivatives BOTH serve to energize capital" - Nathan Israel |
#24
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
In a related matter, I think one of the sometimes overlooked ways to do these future wagers is to do the same sort of pedigree analysis someone might do for a 2yo MSW. Look at the horse's pedigree and in addition to looking at the horse's stamina influences (which everybody does) try to see if this horse is likely to be fast developer. Giant Moon is a perfect example. His dam-side pedigree is tailor made to produce a horse that is a fast-developer. The three stallions in the most important positions in his dam-side pedigree (Capote, Deputy Minister, and Lord Durham) were ALL 2yo champions. Capote, meanwhile demonstrated ability to sire precocious 2yos (Boston Harbor etc). His sire, meanwhile (Giant's Causeway) is a very versatile sire, but he too was a G1 winner at 2, and some of his very best runners have been top-notch 2yos (Shamardal, First Samurai etc). So basically Giant Moon has a pedigree which indicates that it is LIKELY that this horse will - if he has any ability at all - be good as a 2yo. That is good news if you are looking at him in a 2yo MSW, but in my opinion makes him a bad bet in a future pool. Obviously this pedigree does not preclude him from continuing to improve in the months ahead, but it does mean that he is more likely to have already reached his peak than a colt whose pedigree is less geared towards early development. Now in Giant Moon's case, there is also the tiny matter of him not being very fast. I use him here just as an example. I don't really play futures, but if I did, my advice would be to only play horses that are very long odds, that seem likely to be able to go 9f and beyond, and whose pedigree hints that they are not likely to have already reached their peak. |
#25
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#26
|
||||
|
||||
![]() $60 ON CROWN OF THORNS,$40 ON COUNTRY STAR
Actually,I'd put the whole $100 on the horse related to TIAGO("ALONZO"..I THINK).Don't see odds though(so if can't get odds then i'd go with these 2.) Don't know if any of the 3 are still healthy.I'm sure these geeks will know. |
#27
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#28
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
He paid $6.40, $4, and $3.40 http://tcm.bloodhorse.com/viewstory.asp?id=38046 |
#29
|
||||
|
||||
![]() More underlays than overlays. Maybe could narrow it down and dutch 5 for a profit on a small wager, but no one is really a lock at this point. Top choices are Court Vision and Monba so far, but it's way to early. Have to watch these others.
EDIT ATONED -13 COURT VISION -39 COWBOY CAL -13 MONBA -25 VISIONAIRE -10 $100 TOTAL Last edited by Bobby Fischer : 01-10-2008 at 08:34 AM. |
#30
|
||||
|
||||
![]() biggest underlay would have to be Into Mischief.
|
#31
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
please use generalizations and non-truths when arguing your side, thank you |
#32
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#33
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I love the price, but would still love to see him run a "fast" race. He seems to be on the improve, no doubt, but he has yet to run a race that indicates that he's in the same league as any of the division leaders, and I feel like he's had a few good chances to do so. With THAT said, I suppose that's why you get 250-1 on him...and I liked his last race an awful lot. Now that you've got me thinking about it, maybe I'll put some money on that when I'm in Vegas in a few weeks. |
#34
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Best horse you have never heard of Miner's Claim (150-1). But soon you all will know him.
|
#35
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]() |
#36
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Nothing on that board looks interesting to me right now.
|
#37
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#38
|
|||
|
|||
![]() The Futures are great, anything 100-1 or more is worth a shot. Still some horses with talent and pedigrees at 100-1.
|
#39
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
200/1 is just not quite tempting enough - at least when you're dealing with a still unraced 3yo maiden, who missed his most recent work, and has a highly speed oriented pedigree. There's really nothing out there that has me interested right now. |
#40
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|