![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Yeah, I'm thinking that sea of red was worth about three points to the Buckeyes. Maybe more. These teams were one and two going into the game and I saw nothing that should change that. Line 'em up and do it again!
ND is getting no respect from the media and they shouldn't in terms of the title game. But the same media thinks it would be a great accomplishment for USC to beat ND and UCLA (a team that the lowly Irish have beaten). Let's hope the next two weeks games will fix what the BCS will find a way to mess up otherwise. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Somebody "wise than us" will have to explain the whole USC thing, cause I'm not getting it, not even a little bit. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() I do not favor a rematch. Michigan had their shot. You lose, you go to the back of the line just like every other team that has been number 2 this year. The majority of folks that want to see this rematch are folks that favor the Big Ten conference.
__________________
I'm greener than Al Gore so therefore I'm green enough! |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() i can see michigan remaining at number two. usc's one loss was not to ohio st, but to a lesser team. a rematch could happen, and i don't see any reason why they shouldn't meet just because they met once this year already.
ark will hopefully lose vs lsu next week. if not, then florida should take them to school--of course EVERY week since usc, i've been waiting for them to lose again. ark's chances of getting a title shot are slim to none. anxiously awaiting the new bcs line. no way usc should move ahead of michigan, not knowing the season both have had. fla shouldn't move up either.
__________________
Books serve to show a man that those original thoughts of his aren't very new at all. Abraham Lincoln |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|