![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Knock, knock - are you there? The subject of this thread is a book that says Democratic presidents have outperformed Republican presidents on 11 of 12 economic indicators. Obama is not included in this book. Obama is not a subject of this thread. You said the charts were worthless, even if their numbers were right. That's a pretty amazing statement ![]() I haven't made up my mind about this book. I haven't read it. I just posted it as I found it surprising and interesting. So change my mind - show me how the authors are factually wrong, as you assert. Quote:
Quote:
It's apparent that you don't know the difference between opinion and fact. You think they are interchangable and the same, as you use them interchangably. You are wrong. Facts are not opinion. Guess you can't answer my question. I thought I'd give you a chance to show you think, but back you go, Sockpuppet Fake Dee Tee Account, back into the category of the frothing Obama-haters. BTW? I'm not a "liberal" In fact, you know all those "conservatives" over in England that thought Mitt Romney a bloody fool for his disastrous visit before the Olympics? The Prime Minister? Those "far right righties" in England, those "conservatives", are to the left of our current Democratic party in the USA That's how far off the grid the Tea Party loonies have drug this nation to the far, far, FAR right, into John Bircher Land.
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|