Hedging your bets

[Sightseek]

Originally Posted by Dahoss

I think it depends on the odds of the horses you do not have covered and the will pays on your live bets.

I sort of agree with what has already been said in that I would make win bets on the next 3 or 4 horses I think can win (depending on their odds) outside of the 3 I'm live to.

I wouldn't hedge a double.

I would throw them in an exacta before I would go WP.

[robfla]

The last thing you want to do is hedge and lose both bets.

Each situation is totally different and needs to be approached in a different manner depending on expected payouts and odds of horses not covered in original bet.

[santana]

Originally Posted by Sightseek

I would throw them in an exacta before I would go WP.

Possibly using the horses you are alive to for second.....Other than that,hedging is usually a losing prop.

[banter]

Originally Posted by santana

hedging is usually a losing prop.

I also find this to be the case.

[Immanuel Kant]

You have to be alive to a significantly large payout relative to the size of your wager, to hedge. Otherwise , as has been mentioned in this thread, it is a losing prop.

[paulo537]

Originally Posted by Immanuel Kant

You have to be alive to a significantly large payout relative to the size of your wager, to hedge. Otherwise , as has been mentioned in this thread, it is a losing prop.

Hedging is never good.

The larger the potential payoff vs wager size, the worse hedging is. The reason you make this kind of wager is to be live in the last leg with as much a differential on the odds your getting on your live horse(s) vs actual. You need as much of that differential as possible as often as possible to offset losses or instances where you're getting a negative differential in the last leg.

Just my opinion.

[Clip-Clop]

Unless you are bases loaded max odds on a craps table coming out I find hedges are typically losers too.

[Dahoss]

Originally Posted by Sightseek

I would throw them in an exacta before I would go WP.

Definitely.