Baffert uncorked another one!

[blackthroatedwind]

Originally Posted by Calzone Lord

That race got an 89? A bit surprised it was that high.

I almost wonder if that's a misprint, as if that is the fig, they completely broke the race out, and how does it match for the runners-up?

I see it in Formulator, and will look into it tomorrow, but without an explanation, it is either a misprint, or hard to understand at face value.

[Calzone Lord]

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind

I almost wonder if that's a misprint, as if that is the fig, they completely broke the race out, and how does it match for the runners-up?

I see it in Formulator, and will look into it tomorrow, but without an explanation, it is either a misprint, or hard to understand at face value.

Yep. Only thing I can think of is that the figure maker accidently took the final time and applied it to 8.5 furlongs instead of 8f and 70 yards.

I've made mistakes like this before.

[cmorioles]

Originally Posted by Calzone Lord

Yep. Only thing I can think of is that the figure maker accidently took the final time and applied it to 8.5 furlongs instead of 8f and 70 yards.

I've made mistakes like this before.

I'm guessing 69 instead of 89, just a typo when entering the number. Surely they have things like you mention automated by now.

[Calzone Lord]

Originally Posted by cmorioles

I'm guessing 69 instead of 89, just a typo when entering the number. Surely they have things like you mention automated by now.

You're right. It wouldn't add up if they used 8.5f.

[blackthroatedwind]

Originally Posted by cmorioles

I'm guessing 69 instead of 89, just a typo when entering the number. Surely they have things like you mention automated by now.

Exactly right....69. Typo.