![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]() But nice to know you side with the millionaires, and not the protesters. Your opinion, you're entitled to it.
But then perhaps you should not bitch about the cost of city services for "cities that have no money" when the protesters simply exercise their constitutional rights as citizens of that city. It looks really bad. Chuck: Protesters cost money! Cities don't have money! Bad protesters! They are expensive! Beth: Those protesters are protesting the loss of $5 billion dollars in city income, due to tax breaks for the rich in that city. That will cut city services like fire, police, sanitation, and negatively affect everyone, or increase the taxes on those that make less than 1 million dollars. Chuck: But millionaires will leave the city without those tax breaks! Beth: Don't let the door hit you in the ass on the way out, millionaires.
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|