|
|
 |
|
|
|
#1
09-13-2011, 07:54 AM
|
|||
|
|||
i happen to agree with him. the war on iraq was linked to the terrorist attack only in order to justify an unjustifiable attack in iraq. iraq didnt have a thing to do with 911. billions spent to make our country 'safer' when in fact the biggest fearmonger is our govt. defense has always been a huge drain on our budget, now its even worse. the attack absolutely has been used more than once to explain away our bad actions, as tho we are a perennial victim. fdr was right about fear itself, who knew it would take seventy years to prove it?
any questioning of our direction automatically brought the questioners patriotism into account. i would imagine someone at some point will throw that at me. gwb said if youre not with us youre against us, and that is stuck in our psyche... 
|
|
#2
09-13-2011, 09:11 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#3
09-13-2011, 11:51 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Bush, his cronies, and the lies he told this country, is the shame our young men and women have paid for with their lives. Krugman is completely correct about that.
I agree that Bush is honest in his feelings of compassion for the 9-11 victims. And you are free to send an Op-Ed letter with your opposing view to the Times. I'll look forward to it being published.
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts
|
|
#4
09-13-2011, 09:36 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
The timing of the article was disrespectful. I mean seriously there aren't 364 other days to politicalize 9/11 and its aftermath?
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
