![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() The difference being that was was legal and one is illegal
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() The problem is whether legal or not some people use whatever they can get their hands on to improve performance...and think that as long as it doesn't test, they are doing nothing wrong. You're a trainer and a smart one...I'm sure you know others who use stuff on their horses and have absolutely no clue as to what it does. Kind of like going back to Dutrow when asked why he gives his horses steroids...he didn't have an answer for the interviewer.
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
The problem is rather that horse racing is generally run by a bunch of guys in charge of their individual fifdoms, that only react when forced into a corner, and then often react inadequately or oddly inappropriately (Life at Ten and the KHRC a good example of what they view to be the "problems" in the sport) Horse racing in America is a group of cliques, where professionalism varies widely.
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Dutrow is smarter than he looks or talks in interviews. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() I agree...the guy is a great horseman. It's just the perception his clueless response to administering steroids had on the general public leading up to the Belmont. Anyway I just can't agree that Big Brown bought as much good attention to horse racing as Zenyatta. Whether or not that translates into lifelong fans and new bettors who knows.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|