on the filibuster

[miraja2]

Originally Posted by joeydb

It's immoral to take money from someone who worked for it and give it to someone else who didn't work.

So let's say the owner of a major manufacturer dies and leaves the business to his or her child. The person who inherits the business keeps all of the same management and labor that the parent employed, and simply enjoys the profits from the company.
Isn't this person guilty of taking the wealth generated by the management and labor of the company without personally doing any work? Would you consider this an immoral act?

The odd thing about the statement I quoted from you is that I am pretty sure Marx would agree with the statement 100%.....although you two would mean something a bit different.