![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() This is a little blurb from Oppenheim in the TDN (apologies for the strange print, it does that when you copy off a pdf) and I think he fails to realize that most of the people who watch the Breeder's Cup are existing fans of racing - whereas any Triple Crown race (Preakness) is watched by more people who we are trying to reach:
HORSE OF THE YEAR: Interesting comments, and one thing they really highlight is the question: what are the criteria for Horse of the Year? Those of us with votes will be fascinated to refresh our memories when the NTRA directive on the subject is issued to Eclipse voters. But here=s a thought--it=s not necessarily about the fastest horse of the year, or even the horse with the best form. I=m not for Zenyatta strictly because she won the GI Breeders= Cup Classic, beating colts and breaking Personal Ensign=s unbeaten record in the process. I=m for Zenyatta just as much because, in a sport that has been threatening to sink without trace from American public consciousness following Barbaro=s horrible breakdown in the 2006 GI Preakness, and Eight Belles=s horrible breakdown after finishing second in the 2008 GI Kentucky Derby, Zenyatta=s win over the colts in the Breeders= Cup Classic actually got some ink, and restored a modicum of respectability to our sport in the wider public eye. She achieved more than even Rachel did in that hugely important sphere--those Americans who have only the mildest of interest in whether horse racing continues to exist in this country or not. That=s why--unless they tell me that=s not a valid criterion--she gets my vote. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|