Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > Main Forum > The Paddock
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-11-2009, 12:10 PM
RockHardTen1985 RockHardTen1985 is offline
Flemington
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 11,208
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Indomitable DrugS
Don't forget Mariah's Storm (the dam of Giant's Causeway) .. who soundly beat Serena's Song with a 120 Beyer two months earlier.
She was special.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-11-2009, 12:38 PM
GenuineRisk's Avatar
GenuineRisk GenuineRisk is offline
Atlantic City Race Course
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 4,986
Default

Like Sightseek, I've seen a lot of articles using superlatives to describe Zenyatta's challengers:

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/08/sp...enyatta&st=cse

("As she was awaiting the start of the Breeders’ Cup Classic, against the best male horses in the world at a distance she had never run, did she suddenly not want to race?")

http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/mo...ition_in_.html

("So it was Zenyatta against the boys Saturday, a terrific bunch, a 13-horse field, 10 Grade I winners (that means they've had at least one good day).")

http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/2009...n-breeders-cup

("The end is the only place to start when considering the Breeders' Cup card at Santa Anita today. The Classic, with a purse of $5m, is, as the Americans put it, the "deepest" for years, in terms of the sheer number of high-class horses declared to run in the race.")

I saw a few deeper, deepest, strongest ones, too, but I can't find them easily.

Ah, the media. It's not enough that she was the first female to win it, and the first horse to win two different Breeders Cup races, and won Saturday after a pretty sucky start, you have to plump up the field's credentials, too?
__________________
Gentlemen! We're burning daylight! Riders up! -Bill Murray
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-11-2009, 12:40 PM
10 pnt move up's Avatar
10 pnt move up 10 pnt move up is offline
Oriental Park
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,745
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GenuineRisk
Like Sightseek, I've seen a lot of articles using superlatives to describe Zenyatta's challengers:

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/08/sp...enyatta&st=cse

("As she was awaiting the start of the Breeders’ Cup Classic, against the best male horses in the world at a distance she had never run, did she suddenly not want to race?")

http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/mo...ition_in_.html

("So it was Zenyatta against the boys Saturday, a terrific bunch, a 13-horse field, 10 Grade I winners (that means they've had at least one good day).")

http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/2009...n-breeders-cup

("The end is the only place to start when considering the Breeders' Cup card at Santa Anita today. The Classic, with a purse of $5m, is, as the Americans put it, the "deepest" for years, in terms of the sheer number of high-class horses declared to run in the race.")

I saw a few deeper, deepest, strongest ones, too, but I can't find them easily.

Ah, the media. It's not enough that she was the first female to win it, and the first horse to win two different Breeders Cup races, and won Saturday after a pretty sucky start, you have to plump up the field's credentials, too?
what were the better fields assembled this year?
__________________
"To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize"...Voltaire
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-11-2009, 01:53 PM
The Indomitable DrugS's Avatar
The Indomitable DrugS The Indomitable DrugS is offline
Flemington
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 11,007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 10 pnt move up
what were the better fields assembled this year?
The field Rachel Alexandra crushed in the Haskell stacks up well enough for spots 2 thorugh 4.

Summer Bird was 2nd ... he's obviously a better dirt horse.

Munning was 3rd ... Very nice horse who was in sharp form.

Papa Clem was 4th .. he won the Arkansas Derby over Old Fashioned and Summer Bird. Ran 4th in the Ky Derby.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-11-2009, 02:10 PM
10 pnt move up's Avatar
10 pnt move up 10 pnt move up is offline
Oriental Park
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,745
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Indomitable DrugS
The field Rachel Alexandra crushed in the Haskell stacks up well enough for spots 2 thorugh 4.

Summer Bird was 2nd ... he's obviously a better dirt horse.

Munning was 3rd ... Very nice horse who was in sharp form.

Papa Clem was 4th .. he won the Arkansas Derby over Old Fashioned and Summer Bird. Ran 4th in the Ky Derby.
yea, I would take a horse like Papa Clem over Einstein any day of the week and twice on sunday.

They can run on dirt, 10 furlongs, and I will take the euro over munnings.
__________________
"To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize"...Voltaire
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-11-2009, 02:14 PM
The Indomitable DrugS's Avatar
The Indomitable DrugS The Indomitable DrugS is offline
Flemington
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 11,007
Default

I think Papa Clem could have beat Einstein the way he ran on Saturday.

Charlie Weiss might have been able to outrun him.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-11-2009, 01:46 PM
The Indomitable DrugS's Avatar
The Indomitable DrugS The Indomitable DrugS is offline
Flemington
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 11,007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GenuineRisk
Ah, the media. It's not enough that she was the first female to win it, and the first horse to win two different Breeders Cup races, and won Saturday after a pretty sucky start, you have to plump up the field's credentials, too?
They are amazing aren't they.

When you read a lot of that silly stuff you get from the racing press ... it's pretty easy to see why guys like Andy Beyer and Steve Crist are as great as they are.

With those two .. you're talking about guys who are both excellent writers and have a great understanding of the sport in terms of both racing and gambling.

Those two names are company I never have to worry about keeping ... because I couldn't pass a 10th grade English class and only can get hired as a small fry racing writer because of my ability in other areas.

It's the exact opposite with a lot of the guys you see writing on racing ... they're very good writers in a lot of cases ... but they don't really understand racing. Some of them out and out have no idea what they're talking about.

You do also have some that are very good writers/handicappers that have a good understanding of racing .. but have a less than stellar understanding of the betting aspect.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-11-2009, 06:10 PM
GenuineRisk's Avatar
GenuineRisk GenuineRisk is offline
Atlantic City Race Course
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 4,986
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Indomitable DrugS
They are amazing aren't they.

When you read a lot of that silly stuff you get from the racing press ... it's pretty easy to see why guys like Andy Beyer and Steve Crist are as great as they are.

With those two .. you're talking about guys who are both excellent writers and have a great understanding of the sport in terms of both racing and gambling.

Those two names are company I never have to worry about keeping ... because I couldn't pass a 10th grade English class and only can get hired as a small fry racing writer because of my ability in other areas.

It's the exact opposite with a lot of the guys you see writing on racing ... they're very good writers in a lot of cases ... but they don't really understand racing. Some of them out and out have no idea what they're talking about.

You do also have some that are very good writers/handicappers that have a good understanding of racing .. but have a less than stellar understanding of the betting aspect.
It's a good observation- horse racing is a unique sport in that it is intrinsically tied to gambling, and any sort of informed gambling on racing requires some pretty good math skills. And there aren't many people who are equally strong in math and in writing, and sports writing, to be specific.

(I also think it's one of the big reasons horse racing has trouble with the casual fans- nobody told them there would be math. )
__________________
Gentlemen! We're burning daylight! Riders up! -Bill Murray
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-11-2009, 04:44 PM
Indian Charlie's Avatar
Indian Charlie Indian Charlie is offline
Goodwood
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Southern Maine
Posts: 8,708
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RockHardTen1985
She was special.
Right about now, I feel like saying that about you too.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-11-2009, 04:48 PM
Indian Charlie's Avatar
Indian Charlie Indian Charlie is offline
Goodwood
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Southern Maine
Posts: 8,708
Default

Am I the only one who saw the BC classic and thought that Denman was out of his freaking mind saying what he did?

Her race certainly wasn't a bad one, but man, he went wayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy overboard.

I have seen much better performances than that one. Even this year I have!
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 11-11-2009, 05:03 PM
prudery's Avatar
prudery prudery is offline
Ellis Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 495
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Indian Charlie
Am I the only one who saw the BC classic and thought that Denman was out of his freaking mind saying what he did?

Her race certainly wasn't a bad one, but man, he went wayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy overboard.

I have seen much better performances than that one. Even this year I have!

Well then perhaps a corneal transplant is recommended ..

Please ----why haven't you described all the races that trump this one--big lengths, fast, Rachel, Mine That Bird--the tenth at Canterbury ???!!!

A fascinating race that some refuse to see ...

Watching races for 50 years, and it is way up there ...

" not a bad one"--don't make me laugh ...

Never have I seen such a good horse continually not believed in ..

She runs virtually the same race regardless of pace or opposition seemingly by design ... And does it easily ....

She is an original that must do numbers on you numbers guys, and less popular with bettors than horse people--wonder why ???

So far you haven't beat her, but won't join either...

And no I am not president of the pretty pony club--made my first bet--winning--at age 10 ...
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-11-2009, 05:11 PM
The Indomitable DrugS's Avatar
The Indomitable DrugS The Indomitable DrugS is offline
Flemington
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 11,007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by prudery
She is an original that must do numbers on you numbers guys, and less popular with bettors than horse people--wonder why ???
She's less popular with bettors?

Here's her last 10 races.

* 5/2 favorite

* 2/5 favorite

* 1/5 favorite

* 1/5 favorite

* 1/5 favorite

* 1/2 favorite

* 3/5 favorite

* 3/5 favorite

* 1/5 favorite

* 1/5 favorite

I'd also say she had dominant numbers coming into 9 of those 10 races.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11-11-2009, 05:19 PM
prudery's Avatar
prudery prudery is offline
Ellis Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 495
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Indomitable DrugS
She's less popular with bettors?

Here's her last 10 races.

* 5/2 favorite

* 2/5 favorite

* 1/5 favorite

* 1/5 favorite

* 1/5 favorite

* 1/2 favorite

* 3/5 favorite

* 3/5 favorite

* 1/5 favorite

* 1/5 favorite

I'd also say she had dominant numbers coming into 9 of those 10 races.


Sorry , I should have said GAMBLERS--there is a difference ...

Of course she was favored since Pearl Harbor ...

Bad choice of words on my part ...

Gamblers--you know the ones that tried to beat her also since Pearl Harbor and didn't ...
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11-11-2009, 05:25 PM
The Indomitable DrugS's Avatar
The Indomitable DrugS The Indomitable DrugS is offline
Flemington
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 11,007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by prudery
Gamblers--you know the ones that tried to beat her also since Pearl Harbor and didn't ...
Gamblers haven't been trying to beat her until Saturday.

She's faced field after field where she should have been 1/20 on paper all year long.

The only female horse of any ability that she has beat this year (Life Is Sweet) shares the exact same running style as her. That means that if the pace is against Zenyatta - it's also against Life Is Sweet. One won't get a tactical edge on the other and the best will always win.

Absolutely no one with a clue could have bet against her at level weight in her prep either.

She's rabidly loved by people who like 1/5 shots and by pretty horsey people.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 11-11-2009, 05:21 PM
Indian Charlie's Avatar
Indian Charlie Indian Charlie is offline
Goodwood
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Southern Maine
Posts: 8,708
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by prudery
Well then perhaps a corneal transplant is recommended ..
For me, or for you? I suggest you need two corneal transplants. One so that you can read what I actually said, and the other to help you learn to watch a race. If you think that's a top 5 or 10 race run in the 50 years you've been watching races, then frankly, you are beyond clueless.

Have you signed up with AARP yet?


Quote:
Originally Posted by prudery
Please ----why haven't you described all the races that trump this one--big lengths, fast, Rachel, Mine That Bird--the tenth at Canterbury ???!!!
I'm not sure how to react to that. Maybe "Huh?" or "Where did you learn reading comprehension? Perhaps you should have gone to school instead of learning how to read by being taught how to order off the McDonald's menu"

If you are asking me to name a race that was more impressive than this Classic, how about the Preakness from earlier this year? Oh yeah, I can't use that one since you already mocked that possibility above. How about Arazi, or Inside Information? Or heck, even Phone Chatter winning the BC on busted up knees?

Listen man, I never said her race wasn't at all impressive. What I did say was that the track announcer grossly overreacted.


Quote:
Originally Posted by prudery
A fascinating race that some refuse to see ...

Watching races for 50 years, and it is way up there ...

" not a bad one"--don't make me laugh ...

Never have I seen such a good horse continually not believed in ..

She runs virtually the same race regardless of pace or opposition seemingly by design ... And does it easily ....

She is an original that must do numbers on you numbers guys, and less popular with bettors than horse people--wonder why ???

So far you haven't beat her, but won't join either...

And no I am not president of the pretty pony club--made my first bet--winning--at age 10 ...
Ugh.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 11-11-2009, 05:39 PM
prudery's Avatar
prudery prudery is offline
Ellis Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 495
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Indian Charlie
For me, or for you? I suggest you need two corneal transplants. One so that you can read what I actually said, and the other to help you learn to watch a race. If you think that's a top 5 or 10 race run in the 50 years you've been watching races, then frankly, you are beyond clueless.

Have you signed up with AARP yet?




I'm not sure how to react to that. Maybe "Huh?" or "Where did you learn reading comprehension? Perhaps you should have gone to school instead of learning how to read by being taught how to order off the McDonald's menu"

If you are asking me to name a race that was more impressive than this Classic, how about the Preakness from earlier this year? Oh yeah, I can't use that one since you already mocked that possibility above. How about Arazi, or Inside Information? Or heck, even Phone Chatter winning the BC on busted up knees?

Listen man, I never said her race wasn't at all impressive. What I did say was that the track announcer grossly overreacted.




Ugh.
No you said the " race was not bad " and the track announcer over reacted ...I was commenting SPECIFICALLY on that quote--NOT BAD ..

No need for granny glasses, gingko biloba or AARP ..

Not bad is sort of an under reaction as you continue to qualify your being less than impressed with the race by saying you have seen many better this year--that is without naming them originally ... Now you have ...

Speaking of sight, vision and reading comprehension--where did I quantify my remark " right up there " as to the the top five or twenty or any number qualifying exactly what NUMBER I WOULD ASSIGN TO ' RIGHT UP THERE ' ????in reference to the good races I have seen in 50 years ???

NOWHERE except in your head ... Exactly--reading comprehension ..

The whole enchilada --point missed, entirely ...

Do you get it now ???

Uber ugh ...
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 11-11-2009, 05:51 PM
Indian Charlie's Avatar
Indian Charlie Indian Charlie is offline
Goodwood
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Southern Maine
Posts: 8,708
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by prudery

Speaking of sight, vision and reading comprehension--where did I quantify my remark " right up there " as to the the top five or twenty or any number qualifying exactly what NUMBER I WOULD ASSIGN TO ' RIGHT UP THERE ' ????in reference to the good races I have seen in 50 years ???

NOWHERE except in your head ... Exactly--reading comprehension ..
So, when you said this in your first post:

Quote:
Originally Posted by prudery
Watching races for 50 years, and it is way up there ...
Way up there meant in the top 500 races you've seen? To me, Denman's reaction was for an all time great race performance, and by you saying it's way up there, you are agreeing.

Why else say it's way up there in great races of the last 50 years? Would you really be saying that if it was the 175th best race you've ever seen?

Or are you going to try to worm your way out of what you said?
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 11-11-2009, 05:46 PM
Indian Charlie's Avatar
Indian Charlie Indian Charlie is offline
Goodwood
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Southern Maine
Posts: 8,708
Default

Funny thing Prudery. I'm neither a numbers guy or a bettor.

Sorta like you not having a clue I guess.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 11-11-2009, 05:48 PM
prudery's Avatar
prudery prudery is offline
Ellis Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 495
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Indian Charlie
Funny thing Prudery. I'm neither a numbers guy or a bettor.

Sorta like you not having a clue I guess.

No resemblance whatsoever ....
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 11-11-2009, 05:46 PM
The Indomitable DrugS's Avatar
The Indomitable DrugS The Indomitable DrugS is offline
Flemington
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 11,007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Indian Charlie
How about Arazi, or Inside Information? Or heck, even Phone Chatter winning the BC on busted up knees?
Phone Chatter!!!!!

YAY!!!!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.