Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > Sports Bar & Grill
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-22-2009, 04:27 PM
pgardn
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dalakhani
Random thoughts about the upcoming draft:

Ricky Rubio- Let me get this straight. Rubio is a 6 5 inch european point guard that is not especially quick and can't shoot especially well and people actually are talking about him with a number 2 pick? Has the world gone mad?
Did you watch this 18 year old in the Olympics?

He can play. He sees the floor like an NBA vet.
And he made plays against the best players in the United States
like it was a normal day on the court.

He will mature physically. He is skinny.
NBA weight program will be necessary.
PG are usually projects. It has to be the toughest position to walk into.
Huge upside imo.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-22-2009, 04:32 PM
dalakhani's Avatar
dalakhani dalakhani is offline
Del Mar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Washington dc
Posts: 5,277
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pgardn
Did you watch this 18 year old in the Olympics?

He can play. He sees the floor like an NBA vet.
And he made plays against the best players in the United States
like it was a normal day on the court.

He will mature physically. He is skinny.
NBA weight program will be necessary.
PG are usually projects. It has to be the toughest position to walk into.
Huge upside imo.
Point guards are usually projects? Really? How many 18 year old "project" point guards have there been?

Sebastian telfair?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-23-2009, 12:22 PM
somerfrost's Avatar
somerfrost somerfrost is offline
Atlantic City Race Course
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Chambersburg, Pa
Posts: 4,635
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dalakhani
Point guards are usually projects? Really? How many 18 year old "project" point guards have there been?

Sebastian telfair?

Agree with Pgardn here, think Rubio has huge upside. Hans is a classic "tweener" but with his work ethic and maturity, I think he will easily match Lee's numbers, he showed signs of having a good mid-range jumper, on Rome show he talked about that, he gets it! Lawson is way way underrated!
__________________
"Always be yourself...unless you suck!"
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-23-2009, 12:34 PM
dalakhani's Avatar
dalakhani dalakhani is offline
Del Mar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Washington dc
Posts: 5,277
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by somerfrost
Agree with Pgardn here, think Rubio has huge upside. Hans is a classic "tweener" but with his work ethic and maturity, I think he will easily match Lee's numbers, he showed signs of having a good mid-range jumper, on Rome show he talked about that, he gets it! Lawson is way way underrated!
Rubio may have "huge upside". But at point guard? How many projects can you name that have made it at point guard? On the other hand, i can name you about 20 guards that have excelled at international play and ended up not doing well at the NBA level.

Point guard is not a position where you can be " a project" like center. At least with a center, a guy has size and can clog the middle and defend and grab rebounds while he is learning. That isnt the case at point guard. In order for a point guard to play, he has to be ready to run the offense. Do you really want to trust a slow 18 year old that doesnt shoot it well to run your offense? Do you really want to invest a top 5 pick on a guy that you hope will develop into an NBA guard?

I ask again, how many "projects" have made it at point guard?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-23-2009, 10:25 PM
SniperSB23 SniperSB23 is offline
Hialeah Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Albany, NY
Posts: 6,086
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by somerfrost
Agree with Pgardn here, think Rubio has huge upside. Hans is a classic "tweener" but with his work ethic and maturity, I think he will easily match Lee's numbers, he showed signs of having a good mid-range jumper, on Rome show he talked about that, he gets it! Lawson is way way underrated!
Wait, did you just say Hansbrough will easily match 16 and 12 a season?

Last edited by SniperSB23 : 06-24-2009 at 08:38 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-23-2009, 11:07 PM
King Glorious's Avatar
King Glorious King Glorious is offline
Atlantic City Race Course
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Beaumont, CA
Posts: 4,614
Default

I'd rather have Lawson over Rubio. Rubio might turn out to be a star but I've seen enough of these highly regarded foreign players that don't pan out. Guys like Zoran Planinic and Nikoloz Tskitishvili and Darko Milicic Yaroslav Korolev and Saer Sene and Yi Jianlian and Danilo Gallinari. I'd rather take a guy that excelled at the highest level of amateur basketball night in and night out against future NBA players. Rubio does look really good though and anyone that passes him up may regret it later but I'd go with Lawson. That guy is a real player and you know exactly what you'll get with him. It's sort of like do you want the horse that will run you some consistent 100 Beyers and win the occassional grade three race or do you want the one that will be like Discreet Cat or Commentator, have the potential to be brilliant but for some reason, never sustain it.
__________________
The real horses of the year (1986-2020)
Manila, Java Gold, Alysheba, Sunday Silence, Go for Wand, In Excess, Paseana, Kotashaan, Holy Bull, Cigar, Alphabet Soup, Formal Gold, Skip Away, Artax, Tiznow, Point Given, Azeri, Candy Ride, Smarty Jones, Ghostzapper, Invasor, Curlin, Zenyatta, Zenyatta, Goldikova, Havre de Grace, Wise Dan, Wise Dan, California Chrome, American Pharoah, Arrogate, Gun Runner, Accelerate, Maximum Security, Gamine
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-23-2009, 11:15 PM
King Glorious's Avatar
King Glorious King Glorious is offline
Atlantic City Race Course
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Beaumont, CA
Posts: 4,614
Default

And I still think that Lester Hudson is going to make some team happy that they drafted him.
__________________
The real horses of the year (1986-2020)
Manila, Java Gold, Alysheba, Sunday Silence, Go for Wand, In Excess, Paseana, Kotashaan, Holy Bull, Cigar, Alphabet Soup, Formal Gold, Skip Away, Artax, Tiznow, Point Given, Azeri, Candy Ride, Smarty Jones, Ghostzapper, Invasor, Curlin, Zenyatta, Zenyatta, Goldikova, Havre de Grace, Wise Dan, Wise Dan, California Chrome, American Pharoah, Arrogate, Gun Runner, Accelerate, Maximum Security, Gamine
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-23-2009, 11:26 PM
pgardn
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dalakhani
Point guards are usually projects? Really? How many 18 year old "project" point guards have there been?

Sebastian telfair?
Tony Parker.


Did anyone watch the frggn Olympics?

Rubio can play. Not against collegians like Lawson.
The best players on the planet.
I dont give a flyin flip how tall he is, the
guy can play the game.

BTW project does not mean unable.
It means they will get better with maturity.
So there have been a huge number of "projects".
Kevin Durant is a project. Look at how his game changes
after some added strength.

Thabeet is still interesting.
He is such a good defender.
But with the injuries popping up, and the inability
offensively... a taller Oden?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-23-2009, 11:49 PM
dalakhani's Avatar
dalakhani dalakhani is offline
Del Mar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Washington dc
Posts: 5,277
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pgardn
Tony Parker.


Did anyone watch the frggn Olympics?

Rubio can play. Not against collegians like Lawson.
The best players on the planet.
I dont give a flyin flip how tall he is, the
guy can play the game.

BTW project does not mean unable.
It means they will get better with maturity.
So there have been a huge number of "projects".
Kevin Durant is a project. Look at how his game changes
after some added strength.

Thabeet is still interesting.
He is such a good defender.
But with the injuries popping up, and the inability
offensively... a taller Oden?
LOL Most players get better with maturity pgardn. A "project" in NBA parlance refers to a guy that isnt ready to contribute much immediately but there is potential that he can contribute in the future. Kevin Durant certainly DOES NOT fit that profile.

Most NBA point guards are drafted in the hope of contributing something pretty quickly. You dont stash a point guard "project" at the back of the bench like you would a big man. Tony Parker started 72 of 77 games his rookie year for a playoff team in san antonio and was all rookie. He started for a championship team his next year. He wasnt a "project". They drafted him as a player and they got one.

If a team drafts Rubio, it isnt to be a "project". They want some kind of immediate contribution. I question whether that is realistic. Perhaps I will be proven wrong.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-24-2009, 12:09 AM
pgardn
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dalakhani
LOL Most players get better with maturity pgardn. A "project" in NBA parlance refers to a guy that isnt ready to contribute much immediately but there is potential that he can contribute in the future. Kevin Durant certainly DOES NOT fit that profile.

Most NBA point guards are drafted in the hope of contributing something pretty quickly. You dont stash a point guard "project" at the back of the bench like you would a big man. Tony Parker started 72 of 77 games his rookie year for a playoff team in san antonio and was all rookie. He started for a championship team his next year. He wasnt a "project". They drafted him as a player and they got one.

If a team drafts Rubio, it isnt to be a "project". They want some kind of immediate contribution. I question whether that is realistic. Perhaps I will be proven wrong.
Scratch the word project then.
Its used too many diff. ways.
Just like Power Forward.

Tony Parker was pulled numerous times during his first
3 seasons as a Spur in the 4th quarter for more polished
guys. The Spurs had no idea that he would be so good,
no idea. Popvich had many doubts about Parker's mental
game but stuck it out with him because he was so young.

Look.
Rubio is a ball handling genius. He can be bullied because
he is still a kid physically. The NBA is tough. But he will play and contribute
imo mainly because he understands the game.
Can he be intimitated physically? Maybe. Just like Parker was.
He is NOT Derrick Rose physically. He is NOt Ty Lawson or
Johnny Flynn physically. But I personally think he is a better
player. I think he upside is higher than both these guys.
This is what I mean by project, which might be the wrong term.

And yes we will see.
I thought Oden would be a defensive nightmare and rebounder,
and thought L. Aldridge would be a run of the mill
off the bench type.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 06-24-2009, 03:27 AM
Cannon Shell's Avatar
Cannon Shell Cannon Shell is offline
Sha Tin
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 20,855
Default

Rubio can play. Seriously.

Lawson is a nice player but isnt growing anytime soon.

Thabeet may be tall but i cant help think of how Blair of Pittsburgh totally bitched him out.

Mullen is a career backup with 6 fouls at best. Out of the league in 2 years at worst.

Hansborough is a backup at best. He has zero lateral quickness, has a crude offensive game and simply isnt that big. David Lee would eats his lunch.

This is a terrible draft.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 06-24-2009, 06:06 AM
dalakhani's Avatar
dalakhani dalakhani is offline
Del Mar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Washington dc
Posts: 5,277
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cannon Shell
Rubio can play. Seriously.

Lawson is a nice player but isnt growing anytime soon.

Thabeet may be tall but i cant help think of how Blair of Pittsburgh totally bitched him out.

Mullen is a career backup with 6 fouls at best. Out of the league in 2 years at worst.

Hansborough is a backup at best. He has zero lateral quickness, has a crude offensive game and simply isnt that big. David Lee would eats his lunch.

This is a terrible draft.
We will see about Rubio. I watched the olympics and have seen everything you guys have. I want to watch him guarding real NBA pgs in a real NBA game not the olympics. Two totally different games.

Thabeet can rebound and block shots until he fills out and perhaps develops a defensive game.

Hansborough is a career back up. Lee is a totally different player.

This draft is bad at the top but deep with mediocrity.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 06-24-2009, 06:14 AM
dalakhani's Avatar
dalakhani dalakhani is offline
Del Mar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Washington dc
Posts: 5,277
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pgardn
Scratch the word project then.
Its used too many diff. ways.
Just like Power Forward.

Tony Parker was pulled numerous times during his first
3 seasons as a Spur in the 4th quarter for more polished
guys. The Spurs had no idea that he would be so good,
no idea. Popvich had many doubts about Parker's mental
game but stuck it out with him because he was so young.

Look.
Rubio is a ball handling genius. He can be bullied because
he is still a kid physically. The NBA is tough. But he will play and contribute
imo mainly because he understands the game.
Can he be intimitated physically? Maybe. Just like Parker was.
He is NOT Derrick Rose physically. He is NOt Ty Lawson or
Johnny Flynn physically. But I personally think he is a better
player. I think he upside is higher than both these guys.
This is what I mean by project, which might be the wrong term.

And yes we will see.
I thought Oden would be a defensive nightmare and rebounder,
and thought L. Aldridge would be a run of the mill
off the bench type.
Yes, all of those things you say about Parker are true except they did know what they had right away. They knew they didnt have to trade up to draft him because 2001 was before drafting euros was really in vogue and in fact he was the third french guy drafted...ever. Pop stuck with him because he knew that he had great talent.

Rubio is a "ball handling genius"? yes, he showed stretches in international play but its a different game here. We will see. All the scouts and everyone on here agree with you so I realize my view is somewhat contrarian. To me, I think these people are insane.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 06-24-2009, 07:09 AM
King Glorious's Avatar
King Glorious King Glorious is offline
Atlantic City Race Course
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Beaumont, CA
Posts: 4,614
Default

Even though it's international play and against good players, it's still exhibition ball for the most part. Consider how good Patrick Mills of Australia looked. After watching him in the Olympics, you half expected him to completely dominate in college at Santa Clara and while he has been a good college player, he's not reached the levels of his rave Olympic reviews.
__________________
The real horses of the year (1986-2020)
Manila, Java Gold, Alysheba, Sunday Silence, Go for Wand, In Excess, Paseana, Kotashaan, Holy Bull, Cigar, Alphabet Soup, Formal Gold, Skip Away, Artax, Tiznow, Point Given, Azeri, Candy Ride, Smarty Jones, Ghostzapper, Invasor, Curlin, Zenyatta, Zenyatta, Goldikova, Havre de Grace, Wise Dan, Wise Dan, California Chrome, American Pharoah, Arrogate, Gun Runner, Accelerate, Maximum Security, Gamine
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 06-24-2009, 11:57 AM
pgardn
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dalakhani
Yes, all of those things you say about Parker are true except they did know what they had right away. They knew they didnt have to trade up to draft him because 2001 was before drafting euros was really in vogue and in fact he was the third french guy drafted...ever. Pop stuck with him because he knew that he had great talent.

Rubio is a "ball handling genius"? yes, he showed stretches in international play but its a different game here. We will see. All the scouts and everyone on here agree with you so I realize my view is somewhat contrarian. To me, I think these people are insane.
Pop stuck with him because he was young.
And because he was the fastest guy in the NBA.
Is that Talent...? Parker made himself talented. He had no perimeter
game and was very weak going to the basket. Both
of those things have changed through very hard work.
And because of proper strength training he is actually strong now.


I dont know what the scouts say. Seriously I read nothing
about the guy except they say he is good. I watched the kid
on u-tube against inferior competition, and of course the Olympics.

He has very good, BIG, quick hands. He stops and starts, changes
direction dramatically WITH the ball with purpose (not playground,
I now wish to do a dance in front of you and go nowhere).
He sees the entire floor.
He can go to the hole.
He can intiate or direct an offense.

Can he fail? Of course. With the wrong team and wrong
coach asked to do the wrong things, sure he can fail.
Sap the confidence of a player like this, and sure you can
kill him. He is not a great athlete that will beat you physically.
He will have to beef up also imo, the first year will probably
be tough on him physically. More so than the older players
that are physically strong.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:11 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.