9/12: BEL C/O ($608k Friday!!)

[ateamstupid]

I'm pretty sure he wasn't 8-1 in his debut either.

[blackthroatedwind]

Originally Posted by ateamstupid

I'm pretty sure he wasn't 8-1 in his debut either.

He was.

[ateamstupid]

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind

He was.

Seems like good value. Must've been all of you meanies yelling at me that he was an 'obvious toss' that made me retroactively not bet him.

[blackthroatedwind]

Originally Posted by ateamstupid

Seems like good value. Must've been all of you meanies yelling at me he was an 'obvious toss' that made me retroactively not bet him.

Well, then, we were right.

However, I doubt I said he was an " obvious " toss. Not, however, the kind of horse I would bet.

[ateamstupid]

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind

Well, then, we were right.

However, I doubt I said he was an " obvious " toss. Not, however, the kind of horse I would bet.

forget it.

[docicu3]

Assuming they go:

Dr. Decter has to be a BET AGAINST.

and...


I think it's far from 'nonsense' to call Dr. Decter a bet against. He obviously can win, but is an almost certain underlay.
__________________

The problem here was, in retrospect, that these comments are about a win bet in a thread that was about playing the P6.

The only reason I bring it up is that as a group we were not that far of from hitting the damn thing. If we were more focused on the positives from the efforts the group would likely make a ton of money instead of dividing itself into fractions of ineptitude of which I am as guilty as anyone here. Let's get something going for omorrow and put this nonsense behind us.

[ryonker]

OK- so do I get another imaginary $2k for tomorrow?

[ateamstupid]

Originally Posted by docicu3

The problem here was, in retrospect, that these comments are about a win bet in a thread that was about playing the P6.

The only reason I bring it up is that as a group we were not that far of from hitting the damn thing. If we were more focused on the positives from the efforts the group would likely make a ton of money instead of dividing itself into fractions of ineptitude of which I am as guilty as anyone here. Let's get something going fort omorrow and put this nonsense behind us.

So no one can say anything about the card unless it's Pick 6 related? I don't remember that being the rule.

And I was one who almost hit the damn thing, so I obviously never would've called Dr. Decter an obvious toss.

I agree though, that it's time to move on to tomorrow.

[blackthroatedwind]

Originally Posted by docicu3

Assuming they go:

Dr. Decter has to be a BET AGAINST.

and...


I think it's far from 'nonsense' to call Dr. Decter a bet against. He obviously can win, but is an almost certain underlay.
__________________

The problem here was, in retrospect, that these comments are about a win bet in a thread that was about playing the P6.

The only reason I bring it up is that as a group we were not that far of from hitting the damn thing. If we were more focused on the positives from the efforts the group would likely make a ton of money instead of dividing itself into fractions of ineptitude of which I am as guilty as anyone here. Let's get something going fort omorrow and put this nonsense behind us.

What this really sounds like is a redboard. As a group? Huh? Was there some mythical $20K ticket that was being played with everyone's opinion that would have hit this thing? Because, even if Dr. Decter was singled ( a pretty brash assumption ) then how exactly were all the other winners going to get on a ticket?

Anyone that thinks my opinion ( I can't speak for the Fat Man ) suggested leaving him completely off a Pick-6 ticket would completely misconstrue my thoughts in this thread and just about everything I have ever said publicly. He was clearly an A in any serious Pick-6 play....just not a horse I would key on in individual race bets. These are two very seperate concepts.

[GPK]

It's official....after today I really don't like Channing Hill.