IEAH still whining, threatening to go to Haskell

There are more than a few people who said
after the race, more than a day after the race,
SOMETHING HAD TO BE WRONG. And they would
find it.
So now apparently what was wrong was deep track...

At Belmont time we had a horse running with a quarter
crack, that was laboring badly when asked, and filly who
had died at Churchill. The media was all over racing.
Kent pulls the horse up when Brown does not move.
Whats he thinking with his "super horse". I might be thinking,
"OMG this horse has something very wrong, I better take
it easy. What are the repercussions of running the horse
through to the finish line full bore and find an injury after."

I dont blame Kent for this at all.
Who on the board posted or thought
something had to be wrong (medically) with Brown right
after the race...

And now people come back and say the horse is done.
The horse performed very poorly. I find it hard to just
pronounce the horse as done.

What exactly is wrong with him? Was he the only horse
to run all 3 legs of the TC? Seems Belmont was pretty darn
hot that day also.