![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
The consensus then is that we probably won't know how good he is. The prevailing opinion on this board is that we won't see him after the Belmont. While I wasn't a Bernardini fan: when the waters got deep in the BC Classic, he did not disgrace himself. He ran a good race and was beaten by a better horse.
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
No no I agree CM I was speaking of the Derby IF you took the 6 horses that had just run a 0 under Big Brown you come up with a $3400 Tri
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
So TG is looking for BB to bounce and Dutrow is blowing him out the morning of the race? Go figure.
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
just because big brown won, does not make him a fast horse-just faster than what he faced, which wasn't much. it's a shame that he hasn't faced much of quality, since it lessens whatever he accomplishes. but it's hard to warm up to a horse who just barely breaks three digits in a classic race. i've seen better, tons better. but what can you do?
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
To loosely quote my good friend Vanderbilt (from F-Troop), asked what type of woman he wanted when O'Rourke and Agarn were ordering mail order brides: "I just want a girl named SHirley; they all look the same to me". |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
speaking of "tons better"
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
and yeah, it's an accomplishment. but there's no way i'd put this horse on par with many who have won it, or came close but couldn't pull it off for one reason or another. he's gotta win it first tho. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|