Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > Main Forum > The Paddock
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-28-2007, 08:35 PM
Cajungator26's Avatar
Cajungator26 Cajungator26 is offline
Keeneland
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Hossy's Mom's basement.
Posts: 10,217
Default

Good post. I couldn't agree more.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-28-2007, 08:58 PM
Swale84 Swale84 is offline
Louisiana Downs
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 343
Default

Martin claimed foul against Coa citing interference approaching the turn. The stewards took no action letting Laurentide Ice stay in the show position.

The chart of the race states that Light Classic (Martin up) was "bumped into the rail on the turn, was taken up and dropped back"

Not sure why the stewards didn't take any action on the objection since it was very obvious that Coa crowded Light Classic and Martin into the rail.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-28-2007, 09:24 PM
pgardn
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The larger issue is the stewards.

Accountability. Competence. And much more. The tracks are not open enough concerning stewards. Reminds me of boxing sometimes, and how the judges are picked. No accountability. No reviewing the reviewers, all in all, not good for racing because of the lack of openness. They just seem to hide.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-28-2007, 09:27 PM
randallscott35's Avatar
randallscott35 randallscott35 is offline
Idlewild Airport
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 9,687
Default

After years of strange calls, I'm always wondering what qualifications you need to be a steward. Are they the same ones to be a dishwasher at Applebees?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-28-2007, 09:30 PM
blackthroatedwind blackthroatedwind is offline
Jerome Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 9,939
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pgardn
The larger issue is the stewards.

Accountability. Competence. And much more. The tracks are not open enough concerning stewards. Reminds me of boxing sometimes, and how the judges are picked. No accountability. No reviewing the reviewers, all in all, not good for racing because of the lack of openness. They just seem to hide.

I couldn't agree more. Nobody has any say over them and anyone who complains is dismissed as a disgruntled bettor.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-28-2007, 09:39 PM
Left Bank's Avatar
Left Bank Left Bank is offline
Fairgrounds
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Southern Canada
Posts: 1,583
Default

In defense of the New York stewards,they do way better of a job than California stewards,HANDS DOWN!!! The decisions that have been made out there in the past are far worse than ANY of those made in New York,IMO!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-28-2007, 09:42 PM
randallscott35's Avatar
randallscott35 randallscott35 is offline
Idlewild Airport
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 9,687
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kimmeastar
In defense of the New York stewards,they do way better of a job than California stewards,HANDS DOWN!!! The decisions that have been made out there in the past are far worse than ANY of those made in New York,IMO!
The Cali stewards do indeed take the cake.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-28-2007, 09:46 PM
Cannon Shell's Avatar
Cannon Shell Cannon Shell is offline
Sha Tin
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 20,855
Default

I have got on my soapbox about this before so I will spare everyone the details. But what goes on in the stewards stand pretty much regardless of jurisdiction is frightening. Some dont know the rules, some misinterpret them, some do both. I have been told things by stewards that would floor you. That is not to say that there aren't some really good ones but in general the level of stewardship in our country is quite low.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-28-2007, 10:11 PM
Grits Grits is offline
Monmouth Park
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 758
Default

Correct decisions and incorrect decisions are made each day by stewards reviewing races. We'll be pleased with some, irrate with others.

The greater problem to me, here, in this particular case, is one of culpability, neither jockey admitting his actions as wrongful and dangerous.

It is not unlike two 3rd graders before the principal whining,

"he did it,"

"did not, he did it first"

"did not."

Both get detention, as in this particular incident. Problem is . . . its a much greater risk, a far more possibly disastrous outcome, when your weapon is a 1200 lb animal.

I would imagine a stewards job more difficult when and if this occurs.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-28-2007, 10:31 PM
Cannon Shell's Avatar
Cannon Shell Cannon Shell is offline
Sha Tin
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 20,855
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Grits
Correct decisions and incorrect decisions are made each day by stewards reviewing races.
Why would it be acceptable to allow incorrect decisions to be made on a daily basis? How long would you keep your job if you made incorrect decisions on a daily basis? Think about how you would feel if you got taken down in the last leg of a big carryover pick 6 because the stewards made an incorrect decision and they took half a million dollars out of your pocket?
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 03-28-2007, 10:19 PM
Scav Scav is offline
Saratoga
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Northwest of The Chi
Posts: 16,012
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cannon Shell
I have got on my soapbox about this before so I will spare everyone the details. But what goes on in the stewards stand pretty much regardless of jurisdiction is frightening. Some dont know the rules, some misinterpret them, some do both. I have been told things by stewards that would floor you. That is not to say that there aren't some really good ones but in general the level of stewardship in our country is quite low.
Out of curiousity which tracks should we focus on are getting a 'fair' ruling in your opinion? I agree with you and I would rather focus on putting my money into those tracks. Perfect example was today at Santa Anita, the 6 horse in the 7th was a must to come down, a must, and they ruled that way
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-28-2007, 10:37 PM
Cannon Shell's Avatar
Cannon Shell Cannon Shell is offline
Sha Tin
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 20,855
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scav
Out of curiousity which tracks should we focus on are getting a 'fair' ruling in your opinion? I agree with you and I would rather focus on putting my money into those tracks. Perfect example was today at Santa Anita, the 6 horse in the 7th was a must to come down, a must, and they ruled that way
That is a tricky question. Remember that there are three stewards in each booth. 2 morons can cancel out one good guy. It is not like every call is botched but the lack of any standards or formal training makes me believe that the situation is not getting any better.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.