GW I stand behind my man

[Downthestretch55]

Originally Posted by GenuineRisk

Here's more, from balloon-juice's Tim F. Maybe he's channelling DTS in the first paragraph? :

<<Centipedes and scandals. Revisit a short vignette that I wrote about a week ago:

I really hate centipedes. Spiders are cool, but there’s something about centipedes that drives me up the wall. So when those long-legged house centipedes show up in my bathroom I don’t want to get close enough to squash them. Instead I hit it with the Tilex spray (active ingredient: bleach). Sensing that it’s ****ed, the centipede runs around like mad for a short while, occasionally jettisoning a twitching leg. I guess the idea is that whatever attacked it will get distracted by the leg long enough to find some kind of shelter. Lizards do this with their tails, but centipedes make a better example because they can dump a decent number of legs in the course of a chase.

Kyle Sampson was the first twitching leg. Monica Goodling clearly jettisoned herself to get a better shake out of her inevitable scapegoating. Who will the White House jettison next?

Meet Deputy Attorney General Thomas McNulty.

The firestorm over the fired U.S. attorneys was sparked last month when a top Justice Department official ignored guidance from the White House and rejected advice from senior administration lawyers over his testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee.

The official, Deputy Attorney General Paul McNulty, ignored White House Counsel Harriet Miers and senior lawyers in the Justice Department when he told the committee last month of specific reasons why the administration fired seven U.S. attorneys — and appeared to acknowledge for the first time that politics was behind one dismissal. McNulty’s testimony directly conflicted with the approach Miers advised, according to an unreleased internal White House e-mail described to ABC News. According to that e-mail, sources said, Miers said the administration should take the firm position that it would not comment on personnel issues.

When the Bushies dump the #2 official at DOJ they don’t have very many legs left.>>

Though, on some level, I start to see why Bush tried to get Miers stuffed upstairs to the Supreme Court, since she appears to be pretty deep in this, too.

GR,
Since you mentioned me, I'll weigh in.
No, I haven't posted much here lately.
I had a problem with some folks attacking me when I reacted to blatantly racist comments posted here. I was also reminded that this is a "horse racing" board by one of the moderators.
I respected those requests, though not the attacks.
So, back to the "topic" of the thread.

It seems to me that the one invoking the 5th amendment has not been charged with a crime. Precedent establishes that this can only be invoked for such cause. She first needs to answer the subpeona that will be issued, and then respond to questions. Absent of criminal accusation, Ms Goodling has no right to not incriminate herself.
The entire charade is easily seen by those that are capable. When the president states that he wants the American people to know the entire truth, but only within closed doors, without sworn testimony, and without transcript,
it gives the appearance of hiding exactly the same truth that he endorses.

Now I'll again "lurk", as I don't wish to respond to venomous pm's for the blind and bigoted.

Link...
http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/013272.php

DTS

[GPK]

Originally Posted by Downthestretch55

GR,
Since you mentioned me, I'll weigh in.
No, I haven't posted much here lately.
I had a problem with some folks attacking me when I reacted to blatantly racist comments posted here. I was also reminded that this is a "horse racing" board by one of the moderators.
I respected those requests, though not the attacks.
So, back to the "topic" of the thread.

It seems to me that the one invoking the 5th amendment has not been charged with a crime. Precedent establishes that this can only be invoked for such cause. She first needs to answer the subpeona that will be issued, and then respond to questions. Absent of criminal accusation, Ms Goodling has no right to not incriminate herself.
The entire charade is easily seen by those that are capable. When the president states that he wants the American people to know the entire truth, but only within closed doors, without sworn testimony, and without transcript,
it gives the appearance of hiding exactly the same truth that he endorses.

Now I'll again "lurk", as I don't wish to respond to venomous pm's for the blind and bigoted.

Link...
http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/013272.php

DTS

gone a few weeks...and his first post back, he labels me a racist again.

Unreal....

hard to believe you are a grown man Wayne.

[brianwspencer]

Originally Posted by GPK

gone a few weeks...and his first post back, he labels me a racist again.

Unreal....

a racist who loves TEH GAYZ!

[GPK]

Originally Posted by brianwspencer

a racist who loves TEH GAYZ!

yeah...imagine that huh B?

[brianwspencer]

Originally Posted by GPK

yeah...imagine that huh B?

Well, actually -- since that last post I reconsidered.

I realized that my point was moot because I had briefly forgotten about my other 12 racist friends who called to wish me a happy birthday on Saturday.

Who knew?

[paisjpq]

Originally Posted by brianwspencer

a racist who loves TEH GAYZ!

only the white ones though.

[dr. fager]

Originally Posted by GPK

gone a few weeks...and his first post back, he labels me a racist again.

Unreal....

hard to believe you are a grown man Wayne.

Man I missed a lot of excitement during the move? YOU? I would've never thought.

But there's no way I can get toghether with you now this weekend.

[GPK]

Originally Posted by dr. fager

Man I missed a lot of excitement during the move? YOU? I would've never thought.

But there's no way I can get toghether with you now this weekend.

Thats fine....Erin and I will have fun without you

Looking forward to seeing you Saturday.

[dr. fager]

Originally Posted by GPK

Thats fine....Erin and I will have fun without you

Looking forward to seeing you Saturday.

Yeah, she's racist....you two will be fine.

[GPK]

Originally Posted by dr. fager

Yeah, she's racist....you two will be fine.

LMFAO


FYI: I have a table for 3 reserved at Taco Bell. They were hard to come by, but I pulled a few strings

[dr. fager]

Originally Posted by GPK

LMFAO


FYI: I have a table for 3 reserved at Taco Bell. They were hard to come by, but I pulled a few strings

SWEET! I'm stoked....all my dreams are coming true.

[Cajungator26]

Damn, I miss all of the excitement. Bill and Kev in the same Taco Bell together? I hope the toilets there are happier than mine was last night!

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by GPK

LMFAO


FYI: I have a table for 3 reserved at Taco Bell. They were hard to come by, but I pulled a few strings

last of the big time spenders....

i'll have a nachos bell grande please--no beans.

[SentToStud]

Originally Posted by Bababooyee

Your legal advice is always...to put it politely...profoundly ignorant.

Sorta like when you claimed Ford violated the constitution by pardoning Nixon.

Ah, the King of Ignorance has spoken.

Like the time you claimed your tax dollars didn't go toward schools because you owned no property.

You were shown wrong then you deleted your post.

Refusing to learn from your mistakes. Spoken like a career desk jockey.

[Downthestretch55]

Originally Posted by SentToStud

Ah, the King of Ignorance has spoken.

Like the time you claimed your tax dollars didn't go toward schools because you owned no property.

You were shown wrong then you deleted your post.

Refusing to learn from your mistakes. Spoken like a career desk jockey.

LOL!!! S2S!
The one above you proved my point.
Did not wish to address the topic, only attack ME!
Can he again change the topic???
Easy to see.
Yet another failed attempt by the King of Ignorance.
Pathetic.
But very funny.

[SentToStud]

Originally Posted by Downthestretch55

LOL!!! S2S!
The one above you proved my point.
Did not wish to address the topic, only attack ME!
Can he again change the topic???
Easy to see.
Yet another failed attempt by the King of Ignorance.
Pathetic.
But very funny.

LOL.

To his credit, he is entertaining to a degree. He misstates a fact, denies it, deletes it, posts using 'ignorant,' then wraps it all up so neatly tossing out "moron." Like a freaking good watch, he is reliable.

[Downthestretch55]

Originally Posted by SentToStud

LOL.

To his credit, he is entertaining to a degree. He misstates a fact, denies it, deletes it, posts using 'ignorant,' then wraps it all up so neatly tossing out "moron." Like a freaking good watch, he is reliable.

S2S,
The tactic he uses again and again takes the intelligent discussion away from the topic and, alas, goes to "name calling".
I won't stoop to that. This is one of the reasons that I will not dialogue with this person.
When one is unable to debate the stated topic, personal attacks are the last refuge for the bankrupt.
I "googled" my name and found that his lies have been included in my linkages.
Though I protested this to the moderators, the results of his ablilites to debate have resulted in personal consequences.
Therein, one of the reasons I seldom post here. Also, a very good reason to have this low life banned from this site.

[SentToStud]

Originally Posted by Downthestretch55

S2S,
The tactic he uses again and again takes the intelligent discussion away from the topic and, alas, goes to "name calling".
I won't stoop to that. This is one of the reasons that I will not dialogue with this person.
When one is unable to debate the stated topic, personal attacks are the last refuge for the bankrupt.
I "googled" my name and found that his lies have been included in my linkages.
Though I protested this to the moderators, the results of his ablilites to debate have resulted in personal consequences.
Therein, one of the reasons I seldom post here. Also, a very good reason to have this low life banned from this site.

Well, he went from libeling you in his signature line to quoting Fred Reed degrading women. Like I said, he's predictably amusing and you can set your watch by his denials, profanities, abusiveness and excuses ("the moderators asked me to edit that post!!!"). I'm just pissed off there's no MCL Lounge in my neighborhood. He's just a bored, challenged guy with one eye on the clock and the other over his shoulder making sure his supervisor doesn't bust him for surfing the net.

[dr. fager]

Originally Posted by SentToStud

He's just a bored, challenged guy with one eye on the clock and the other over his shoulder making sure his supervisor doesn't bust him for surfing the net.

Watch it...that's at least 60% of us I bet.....

[Downthestretch55]

S2S,
I don't know if you caught this one about Bush's Monica...
http://ptoday.blogspot.com/2007/03/m...hs-future.html

As far as the taking it "off-topic-guy"...the damage has been done.
Too late for apologies.
Like Bush and his junta, excuses are easy. Regrets are obvious.
As for me...I'll get over it.
As for this once great country...it might take a while.
There's now talk of impeachment, not from the dems, but from the repfugitups...see Hagel and others.
As you might know, I'll bypass the impeachment debate...go directly to Hague, do not pass go...let the war crimes trials begin. The world is watching.
And they already see the bankruptcy of Shrub's administration.
Unfortunately, this time the damage done is far bigger than the stupidity of Babba-a-hole's lunacy.