![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Yes he does and this issue needs to be addressed. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Of course you should be able to qualify more than once. And there is no way of knowing how many of the 3 women in the TOP 10 were from dual entries. Last year, I believe 2 women in the Top 20's entries were being played by a relative or friend....Of course women can cap, but women entering these contests on their own is not common at all.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
The letter writer did a good service though because i would think that they would now have to rectify this situation because its not fair. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
They were aware that the problem needed to be addressed but this letter did a terrific job of driving the point home. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
You can't stop it unless you sequester the participants. Anybody in these tournaments can be coached with the communication choices out there. How can you possibly stop it? |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Additionally, they need to make the tournament payout structure less top-heavy. First prize paid a whopping $400,000 but 6th place only paid $8,000 in the NHC, that's even more stratified than poker tournaments which have the same problem IMO.
__________________
please use generalizations and non-truths when arguing your side, thank you |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|