Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > Sports Bar & Grill
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-24-2007, 06:32 PM
Gander Gander is offline
Del Mar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,336
Default Federer plays Roddick tonight

Well the match takes place at 3:30am eastern time tomorrow morning.

Is this worth staying up for?

Roddick has been playing well but Federer has yet to lose 1 set in this tournament and has won 12 of their last 13 meetings.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-25-2007, 04:22 AM
SCUDSBROTHER's Avatar
SCUDSBROTHER SCUDSBROTHER is offline
Flemington
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: L.A.
Posts: 11,326
Default

Roddick couldn't hang with him(at all.) Gonzalez should beat Haas,and he has a chance in the final.Fernando is (for some reason) a much more smart player than he used to be.He easily blew Nadal away.He used to be such an impatient btch.Maybe he(Fernando) got hormone replacement therapy.Probably won't beat Federer this time,but is a threat the rest of the year(especially in the U.S. Open=was always his best surface anyways.)In other news, big girl(Serena) into the finals (versus Sharapova.)
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-25-2007, 04:48 AM
timmgirvan's Avatar
timmgirvan timmgirvan is offline
Havre de Grace
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Powder Springs Ga
Posts: 5,780
Default

As Dick Enberg said "Roger dismantled Roddick" Next!!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-25-2007, 08:03 AM
Gander Gander is offline
Del Mar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,336
Default

I didnt watch the match but I guess it was a complete domination. Saw the highlights and it didnt even look like Roger worked himself into a sweat. There were some amazing shots Roger hit and it didnt appear that Roddick played bad. Looks like he is on his way to another Grand Slam win.

Roger and Tiger, let the comparisons and debates on who is more dominating continue. Good stuff here.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-25-2007, 08:11 AM
randallscott35's Avatar
randallscott35 randallscott35 is offline
Idlewild Airport
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 9,687
Default

Federer is amazing.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-25-2007, 08:53 AM
brockguy's Avatar
brockguy brockguy is offline
Santa Anita
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,263
Default

funny thing is that Roddick thought he had a chance tonight...
__________________


#Grand
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-25-2007, 08:53 AM
Gander Gander is offline
Del Mar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,336
Default

You really get a feeling that Roddick went into that match thinking he could win. He seemed more frustrated than ever before losing to Federer. I think its because he did everything he could to win and still could not even come close to taking a set. He threw his racket and had a few temper flare ups after Roger hit some of Roddick's balls back that Roddick believed were winners.

Hes easily the best I have ever seen. I dont remember Sampras beating guys who were playing their absolute best tennis in 3 straight sets.

I also dont buy the argument that the competiton he faces makes him look better. I dont think Federer would have had that many problems with Sampras and Agassi, and the guys Sampras and Agassi were beating to win their slams.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-25-2007, 08:54 AM
randallscott35's Avatar
randallscott35 randallscott35 is offline
Idlewild Airport
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 9,687
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gander
You really get a feeling that Roddick went into that match thinking he could win. He seemed more frustrated than ever before losing to Federer. I think its because he did everything he could to win and still could not even come close to taking a set. He threw his racket and had a few temper flare ups after Roger hit some of Roddick's balls back that Roddick believed were winners.

Hes easily the best I have ever seen. I dont remember Sampras beating guys who were playing their absolute best tennis in 3 straight sets.

I also dont buy the argument that the competiton he faces makes him look better. I dont think Federer would have had that many problems with Sampras and Agassi, and the guys Sampras and Agassi were beating to win their slams.
Federer is the best I've seen for sure. His game is more well rounded than anyone else. And Agassi said he's the best he ever played as well so that covers the last 20 years right there.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-25-2007, 08:58 AM
Gander Gander is offline
Del Mar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,336
Default

John Mcenroe said Roger is the best he has ever seen. While he did not compete against Federer on the tour, Mcenroe has played against Roger in some exhibitions.

Fed is so easy to root for. Seems like a great guy off the court as well. On the court I dont think I have ever question one single call.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-25-2007, 09:33 AM
Coach Pants
 
Posts: n/a
Default

He'll sweep the slams this year.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 01-25-2007, 09:40 AM
EpBurns EpBurns is offline
Morris Park
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 128
Default

Saw the highlights this morning it was a thrashing, Roddick won exactly 6 points in the second set while being shut out, Federer just too much, kind of reminds me when Borg was beating everyone in sight easily.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01-25-2007, 02:43 PM
SCUDSBROTHER's Avatar
SCUDSBROTHER SCUDSBROTHER is offline
Flemington
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: L.A.
Posts: 11,326
Default

At his best,Safin beat both Federer and Sampras(to win this tournament ,and the U.S. Open.)Will this guy ever see that form again,or is that it? What a waste of talent.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 01-25-2007, 02:50 PM
Gander Gander is offline
Del Mar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,336
Default

Its an embarassment that he got taken down by Roddick in this tournament, yet he beats Federer and Sampras. Go figure that one out. Hes a headcase.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 01-25-2007, 03:23 PM
Coach Pants
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Safin could play the best tennis of his life and it still wouldn't be enough to beat Federer. Federer's game has improved tremendously since 2005.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 01-25-2007, 03:50 PM
Gander Gander is offline
Del Mar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,336
Default

I would have to agree with you there Pillow Pants. Some of the shots I saw him hit last night and in previous matches lately have been out of this world. I never thought a guy that good could get better, but he apparently has.

A grand slam run is upon us. Witness greatness.

As a side note, I also agree with Scuds on the talent that Marat Safin has. I saw him once in Saratoga, he was having a beer in a outside restaurant and I was running by. Hes a very huge guy. It was just before the US Open 2 years ago.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 01-25-2007, 03:53 PM
randallscott35's Avatar
randallscott35 randallscott35 is offline
Idlewild Airport
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 9,687
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gander
I would have to agree with you there Pillow Pants. Some of the shots I saw him hit last night and in previous matches lately have been out of this world. I never thought a guy that good could get better, but he apparently has.

A grand slam run is upon us. Witness greatness.

As a side note, I also agree with Scuds on the talent that Marat Safin has. I saw him once in Saratoga, he was having a beer in a outside restaurant and I was running by. Hes a very huge guy. It was just before the US Open 2 years ago.
I hope he beats Nadal in the French who is more "drugged up" than Aptitude during the great EPO year of Frankel.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 01-25-2007, 03:58 PM
Gander Gander is offline
Del Mar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,336
Default

The way Nadal has been playing the last few months, he'll be lucky to make it to the semis of the French. I like the guy and root for him. His form has been (by his standards) an utter mess lately. I know hes been hurt and such but hes lost to some people he should not be losing to.

I think Federer gets it done this year at the French.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 01-25-2007, 04:07 PM
Coach Pants
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Nadal might win, at most, 3 more slams. His style of play invites injuries.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 01-25-2007, 04:20 PM
Gander Gander is offline
Del Mar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,336
Default

Nadal might win, at most, 3 more slams. His style of play invites injuries.

How many do you see Roddick winning?
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 01-25-2007, 04:47 PM
Coach Pants
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gander
Nadal might win, at most, 3 more slams. His style of play invites injuries.

How many do you see Roddick winning?
Maybe 1. Of course it's hard to look at his game objectively after a massacre like last night.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.