![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Sort of interesting that I always thought US bettors got the shaft. Two days in at Ascot and we have seen gate scratches with no explanation, a favorite rear because the race went off before his rider was ready and a horse whose blindfold didn't get taken off before the start so he was off at least 5 lengths slow.
I wonder how bettors can get screwed on day 3. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() ^Agreed. Of course I’m biased having bet Golden Pal (not my best work) and Lord North (probably wasn’t winning but could’ve been second, no?) I also have potentially been impacted by the gate scratches but will say I kind of like how they make quick decisions however if that is the case what’s the excuse for wasting an hour trying to get a no chance horse in the stall during the Golden Pal race? I think it was a legitimately bad bet and the way the Aussie showed cruising speed/crushed but prior to the race I mentioned to my betting partner this is an insane advantage for the Aussie compared to Golden Pal…played out and again I don’t think it necessarily changed the result..but it seems a little arbitrary where sometimes decisions are made in a split second and then they do this. Love Royal Ascot though, just some observations
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I can't see how anyone could actually enjoy betting and watching the racing at Royal Ascot, most races is impossible to pick a winner and when I do bet a race I have no idea where my horse is or even what stall the horse is coming out of, plus the straight away races with no turns are not enjoyable, too wierd for me, give me good old USA racing with turns and different color saddle cloths so I know where my losing bet is,
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Well, it took all of ONE race on day 3 for bettors to get screwed.
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|