Gov Haley demands rebel flag removal

[Rudeboyelvis]

RACIST CAR!!



http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-0...evel-pc-idiocy

This is Orwellian

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by Rudeboyelvis

RACIST CAR!!



http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-0...evel-pc-idiocy

This is Orwellian

well, it is racist.
they can strip it, or not. it's their choice. i haven't heard anyone say the flag should be banned, barred, not sold, not bought. everyone individual can fly whatever bloody flag they wish.
but it should NOT be on property like state capitols, that's just ridiculous.

[GenuineRisk]

Originally Posted by Rudeboyelvis

This is Orwellian

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by GenuineRisk

[OldDog]

Originally Posted by Rudeboyelvis

RACIST CAR!!



http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-0...evel-pc-idiocy

This is Orwellian

Indeed. But what does it matter. We are seriously screwed anyway. Legislators are bought, and what they write into law means nothing. This is all pretend.

[GenuineRisk]

Originally Posted by OldDog

Indeed. But what does it matter. We are seriously screwed anyway. Legislators are bought, and what they write into law means nothing. This is all pretend.

Please post links to where the decision to stop manufacturing General Lee toys was in any way due to legislation passed by any government, local, state or national. This was a business choice made by a company. They decided continuing to manufacture the toy is bad for business, so they are stopping. This is purely market-driven.

Here are some other toys that are no longer made:

http://www.ebaumsworld.com/pictures/view/767254/

[OldDog]

Originally Posted by GenuineRisk

Please post links to where the decision to stop manufacturing General Lee toys was in any way due to legislation passed by any government, local, state or national.

My screed was directed at news which developed this morning, not connected with the flag issue but more so with governmental trends. I sincerely apologize for causing any confusion, consternation or offense.

[Rudeboyelvis]

Originally Posted by GenuineRisk

Please post links to where the decision to stop manufacturing General Lee toys was in any way due to legislation passed by any government, local, state or national. This was a business choice made by a company. They decided continuing to manufacture the toy is bad for business, so they are stopping. This is purely market-driven.

Here are some other toys that are no longer made:

http://www.ebaumsworld.com/pictures/view/767254/

Yes because the General Lee was painted specifically, and for no reason other, than to promulgate hate. To follow your absurd logic, the Network Executives and everyone that ever watched the television show, as well as any actor that ever participated in the making of the program are all guilty racists by proxy as well.

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by Rudeboyelvis

Yes because the General Lee was painted specifically, and for no reason other, than to promulgate hate. To follow your absurd logic, the Network Executives and everyone that ever watched the television show, as well as any actor that ever participated in the making of the program are all guilty racists by proxy as well.

wut?

[Rudeboyelvis]

Originally Posted by Danzig

wut?

Please block me. Please. I'm begging you.

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by Rudeboyelvis

Please block me. Please. I'm begging you.

your reply had nothing to do with what gr said, that's why i put that. it made no sense. and, feel free to go to user settings and do as you wish.

[GenuineRisk]

Originally Posted by Rudeboyelvis

Yes because the General Lee was painted specifically, and for no reason other, than to promulgate hate. To follow your absurd logic, the Network Executives and everyone that ever watched the television show, as well as any actor that ever participated in the making of the program are all guilty racists by proxy as well.

[bigrun]

Meanwhile two more churches burned...the one in Macon was confirmed arson and the NC under investigation


http://www.theatlantic.com/national/...eorgia/396881/

[joeydb]

Originally Posted by OldDog

Indeed. But what does it matter. We are seriously screwed anyway. Legislators are bought, and what they write into law means nothing. This is all pretend.

[GenuineRisk]

[Rudeboyelvis]

Originally Posted by GenuineRisk

The funny thing is, there are as many tax paying, liberty loving Americans that find THAT flag offensive (myself NOT included). Good luck getting IT taken down. The hypocrisy of the fringe far left is boundless. So worried about people's feelings and the *hurt* that a flag causes to people who choose to be offended by it. lolololol

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by Rudeboyelvis

The funny thing is, there are as many tax paying, liberty loving Americans that find THAT flag offensive (myself NOT included). Good luck getting IT taken down. The hypocrisy of the fringe far left is boundless. So worried about people's feelings and the *hurt* that a flag causes to people who choose to be offended by it. lolololol

apparently you are either choosing to ignore, or just don't care, what the confederate battle flag represented and continues to represent. it has NOTHING in common with the rainbow flag.
one is a people trying to get treated equally, the other flew over a people determined to remain supreme over others, to own them. it continued to show that when it started appearing again, during the civil rights movement.
so, yeah, go ahead and ignore all that history...pretend it's just about 'feelings'.

[Rudeboyelvis]

Originally Posted by Danzig

apparently you are either choosing to ignore, or just don't care, what the confederate battle flag represented and continues to represent. it has NOTHING in common with the rainbow flag.
one is a people trying to get treated equally, the other flew over a people determined to remain supreme over others, to own them. it continued to show that when it started appearing again, during the civil rights movement.
so, yeah, go ahead and ignore all that history...pretend it's just about 'feelings'.

I didn't say one had anything at all in common with the other, you simp. I said that there are as many people (mostly deeply religious folks) that choose to be offended by the rainbow flag as there are people who choose to be offended by the stars and bars.

If feelings are the top priority this country has nowadays (you yourself haven't taken 5 minutes to STFU about it in a week) it's hypocritical to embrace one action and bathe in the schadenfreude of another.

But who would expect anything less from you and GR?

Don't bother responding to me. Please.

[Pants II]

Originally Posted by Danzig

apparently you are either choosing to ignore, or just don't care, what the confederate battle flag represented and continues to represent. it has NOTHING in common with the rainbow flag.
one is a people trying to get treated equally, the other flew over a people determined to remain supreme over others, to own them. it continued to show that when it started appearing again, during the civil rights movement.
so, yeah, go ahead and ignore all that history...pretend it's just about 'feelings'.

You have no f.ucking clue what the confederate battle flag represented, you imbecile.

Grant had slaves 3 years after Robert E. Lee had given up his.

Tired of you fat stupid idiots with your pantsuit agenda. What you need to do is get in the f.ucking kitchen and shut the f.uck up with your worthless know-nothing condescension.

You're the biggest idiot on this forum, zig. And that's past, present and future.

[GenuineRisk]

Originally Posted by Rudeboyelvis

The funny thing is, there are as many tax paying, liberty loving Americans that find THAT flag offensive (myself NOT included). Good luck getting IT taken down. The hypocrisy of the fringe far left is boundless. So worried about people's feelings and the *hurt* that a flag causes to people who choose to be offended by it. lolololol

I'm sorry, I can't hear you over the sound of Tom Wopat's gorgeousness.