Quote:
Originally Posted by v j stauffer
The horses " are where they are ". The jockey's actions, except sometimes in the first jump are a non-factor.
You may not like or agree with that. But I can assure you that's the way the vast majority of stewards do it.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by v j stauffer
Some calls are close. Some are not.
You're certainly entitled to think it's preposterous.
However that is how the process works.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by v j stauffer
What if they do their very best to control yet their horse doesn't respond and still fouls another horse? Should the stewards leave the result alone just because the jockey gave his best effort?
I know this is hard to grasp for the average horseplayer.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by v j stauffer
DTer's can respond however they see fit. Quizzically, vituperations, conspiracy theories, attacking integrity. Whatever.
I'm trying to contribute by sharing how the stewarding process works. Nuts and bolts. Day to day protocol.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by v j stauffer
It has nothing to do with late or not for the bettors.
I don't understand why that is so hard to grasp?
|
Congrats. You've swept in and have taken trolling to a whole new stratospheric level.
This "Average Horseplayer" hasn't wagered more than 50 bucks in California since Hollywood Park closed and I have doubts as to whether I'll ever play the circuit regularly, ever again. Thankfully, I now understand the "stewards process" there, all too well.
You play a game of semantics, saying the same thing over and over in a different way to troll the thread. Hope you got a good chuckle out of insulting the very people that keep this "sport" afloat. You're a fine ambassador.