![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Curious that a stupid,ill conceived sentence, derails all discussion of the downward spiral of golf written in the piece.
![]()
__________________
The virtue of a man ought to be measured, not by his extraordinary exertions, but by his everyday conduct. Blaise Pascal |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
So, what about that article or the state of the game in general would you like to discuss?
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Well, without rereading it, i was not aware of the big downturn, and the demographics of golfershas skewed up to the rich being a higher % than before as the middleclass has not returned after the recession. That the boomers have not skewed up ,and the millenials also not interested. golf courses closing, and this Topgolf and footgolf were a surprise. My own golfing down due to med conditions,so i am a bit behind. Also, why golf rates dont reduce to get more people to golf. Starters...
__________________
The virtue of a man ought to be measured, not by his extraordinary exertions, but by his everyday conduct. Blaise Pascal |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
I'm eager to see what local courses (if any) implement the basketball rim sized holes. Maybe then I'll be able to put my Scotty to good use and sink a damn putt over 10 feet!
__________________
"A person who saw no important difference between the fire outside a Neandrathal's cave and a working thermo-nuclear reactor might tell you that junk bonds and derivatives BOTH serve to energize capital" - Nathan Israel |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Condensed version:
#1 Too many, high end, daily fee golf courses. Very few private clubs closing and not too many lower end public courses closing either. #2 Golf club market is beyond saturated, thanks to 2 companies in particular. I could rant forever about one of them, but I will refrain. Assholes... #3 Too costly. A great deal of that reverts back to #1. All these high end daily fee courses trying to maintain lush playing conditions have to pass on that cost to the consumer. Hopefully the movement that ClubCorp and Pinehurst resorts started this year during the US Opens will take hold. Less grass, less water, less fertilzer=LESS COST If courses can do that, and cut $75-$100k in expenses, that's a good size nut not being passed on.I refuse to buy the excuse "the game is too hard." What a crock of sh*t. The game is as easy to play as it has ever been. I would have hated to see some of these people take up the game back when the game was really hard. ![]() I think (and hope) that golf makes a comeback. Some of the things that aren't working and haven't been working will be weeded out. Not sure if the game will return to the heights that it once enjoyed, but I'm convinced that's probably a good thing. |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Agree with both Tom and Kevin above on all points. When I lived in the DC area, to play a reasonably priced public course usually meant a 30 to 60 min drive outside the beltway. The drive combined with a 5+ hr round essentially meant a full day commitment. And many of these courses were still charging in excess of $75 on the weekend.
Two other points I think are factors: 1. The Tiger effect. When Tiger was at the top, even if you were not a fan, you still would watch golf because you would likely see something amazing. He also had cool commercials which appealed to a wide variety of people which brought greater interest and attention to golf. I believe there is a direct correlation between the down turn in golf interest and his fall from grace off the course and dominance on the course. I know I do not watch golf like I once did and that includes majors which would be must see TV for me in the past 2. Smart phones. There was a time not too long ago you could go to the course to get away from the outside world. Now you hit a shot and likely check your phone for messages, tweets, sports scores, race results etc before you hit your next shot. A lot can happen in the outside world during a 5 hr round. Twitter, Facebook, social media outlets have conditioned us for immediate info updates. Not saying its a bad thing, just the way it is. A modern day element adding to a good walk spoiled. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Interesting comment regarding equipment. My guess is Swoosh and TM make your "hole" list. I find TM to be a company who has successfully pulled the wool over a lot of golfers eyes. Swoosh presence in amateur golf is almost nonexistent. But their apparel is crap. TM uses paint and glitter to force feed the market with latest and greatest and almost prides itself in doing so. And it's hard to imagine what their PGA Tour spend must be. I feel like their products are average at best, and the technology at this time must be at the upper reach of compliance anyhow. Any surviving manufacturer today makes a decent product, so TM's days of milking the public cow are coming to an end. Just my view.
__________________
2705 Central Avenue |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
![]() They are wholly-owned by Adidas, and have more than enough cash to over-market their wares. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|