another shooting

[GenuineRisk]

Originally Posted by dellinger63

Do you all realize homicides by guns are at their lowest rates since 1981? That in 1993 we had 7 gun homicides per 100K while today the rate is 3.6 per 100K (almost half?).

The gun violence problem is greatly exaggerated by those with a anti-gun stance. If those same people realized in 2010 suicides by gun were almost double homicides by gun it may become clear this is more of a choice issue. Similar to the choice afforded to a mother of an unwanted embryo.

Just wish we could find a way to convince shooters to kill themselves before killing others and many of these mass shootings could be avoided w/o impeding lawful residents with needless/endless regulations.

The problem with those stats, Dell, which the NY Times article touches on, is that it depends on what the police choose to call a "homicide" and what they call an "accident." Data is only as good as the collection method, and the challenge is that you don't know if the police reported accurately.

Kind of like how "pit bulls," which isn't even an actual dog breed, are listed as the dog in the majority of fatal dog attacks, but the report of the dogs' breed is based on police report or witness identification. And many dogs get misidentified as "pit bulls."

However, unlike guns, dogs actually get banned by cities.

Useless trivia- while "pit bulls" are the dogs at the top of fatal dog attacks, the dogs in the top three spots for dog bites are German Shepherds, Chows and... Golden Retrievers!

Personally, I bet Chihuahuas are actually number one, but people are just too embarrassed to admit they got bitten by a little rat dog.