Good God

[CSC]

I don't know if IDrugS knows that in europe they do not solely use the simple ratings as we do in North America, firm, good, soft, yielding. He probably thinks he has nothing to learn in the game anymore, but in an effort to enlighten him, there is more to reading up on past p's than what is offered from the DRF.

Here is the link to Europe's preiminate Horseracing Publication that will end this. Where terms such as Good/Yielding, Good/Soft, Good, Soft apply, a much more accurate detailing of the amount of cut in the ground.

Obcourse he used I guess the DRF past p's to base his entire analysis that Hawk Wing was very effective on yielding ground. But in essence it was labeled as Good To soft in the Eclipse over his hapless stablemate Sholokhov. If this is what he is basing Hawk Wing is effective on softer ground, he is surely wrong. He just won't or cannot admit that he still has a few things to learn about European racing.

Here's Hawk Wing's complete Past p's according to Racing Post. You decide, obcourse the alternative is Coolmore has a dunce running their operation, one that cannot distuinguish ground conditions.

http://www.racingpost.com/horses/hor...orse_id=547525

BTW notice the lost to Rock Of Gibralter on actual 'yielding' ground.