|
|
 |
|
#1
02-19-2009, 05:55 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Can A "Gambler" Be A "Fan" ?
Sure they can right? What do you guys think?
My point is this - I think the general perception of folks outside of Horse Racing see us "gamblers" of the sport not as fans but strictly as Gamblers. I would define it as this and curious as to your thoughts. The guy or gal who bets numbers or odds strictly "my birthday", "my area code", "my numbers" is strictly a Gambler where as the guy or gal who studies the form, etc is both. 
|
|
#2
02-19-2009, 05:58 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
#3
02-19-2009, 06:09 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
It's okay to be a fan because a horse makes you money....I see nothing wrong with that...
The horse gives you something, and you support the horse by being a fan. 
|
|
#4
02-19-2009, 06:12 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Well now that I think of it, the guys that bet strictly by the numbers and don't even remember the horse's name, okay maybe those aren't fans....
|
|
#5
02-19-2009, 11:15 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Of course. But you'll lose a lot of money if you don't realize you are both.
|
|
#7
02-20-2009, 08:09 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
That is the part i can never understand as i spend alot of times in pubs & train horses i could never understand the person goes from race to race never happy if they win or lose cause if the win they should have had more money on it etc for me each race is a story full of curves & turns right from the time the barriers open ,Yes i love a bet but funnily enough i never bet on my own horses as i feel gambling distorts a persons point of view but to watch a horse in full flight from Apache Cat to Smarty Jones i dont think there is anything finer in life
|
|
#8
02-20-2009, 08:29 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Do I think Charity can win? Well, I am walking around in yesterday's suit.
|
|
#9
02-21-2009, 11:00 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
a thing of beauty. It's fun to gamble too, but not so much if your heart is involved in the outcome.
|
|
#10
02-21-2009, 12:50 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Without fans there would be no gamblers. To be a gambler in horse racing you have to have some "fan" in you. Otherwise, you'd play a shot machine which produces the results of your gamble much quicker than waiting for a horse race.
And without gamblers there would be no horse racing. It might exist, but not nearly on the scale it is today.
|
|
#11
02-22-2009, 02:43 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#13
02-22-2009, 08:44 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
And I disagree. Why would a "gambler" spend time going to a racetrack when they can satisfy their need to gamble via easier means? The simple fact they get in their car and drive to the track, walk in and become a part of the atmosphere means they have some fan in them, even though it might be a fraction of a percent. Horse racing requires a lot in terms of the gambler... Our races are not structured so they go off every few minutes. There are often dead times between races. Not every race is a playable race. Gambles can payoff, only to be yanked away by a DQ. etc. etc. etc. Whereas a slot machine, a lottery scratch-off or even blackjack and other casino games, the results are quicker, definitive and there is often no barrier to entry in terms of knowledge or skill (sans the table games).
|
|
#14
02-22-2009, 01:03 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#15
02-23-2009, 06:28 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Many good points here so far.
I think that it mostly depends on how you define "gambler". Would we define "gambler" as "horseplayer", or are we saying that the gambler is someone who wagers to excess? This makes a difference because the game's structure is centered around the wagering on the outcome. The game needs players -- they do not have to be excessive gamblers. Compare the excessive gambler to an alcoholic: the alcoholic needs a fix, in a pinch the alcoholic doesn't care if it's beer, wine, scotch, or tequila -- he needs the alcohol, the active ingredient. Similarly someone with a gambling problem likes to wager, if possible on their favorite game, but otherwise on any speculative enterprise offering the possibility of winning and adrenaline in the playing of the game. This sort of gambler is not likely to be a fan of any particular game but more of the right to wager and the availability of legalized gambling. I tend to disagree with the idea of not caring about races I don't wager on. I watch the Triple Crown every year, even if I don't get the chance to wager on it. Why? Because those races, along with some other Grade 1's and the Breeders Cup offer some of the best contests among the classiest horses of the breed. Young children like my nieces and nephews will appreciate a race when it's on TV and they have no desire or ability to gamble yet as they are too young. But the appeal is there. Where else can many of us in the urban east coast or west coast states actually see a horse run, except on TV? I think it's pretty cool. Anachronistic, yes, but that's part of the appeal. I think it would be stranger for many of us to mention the horsepower of a particular automobile without ever having actually seen a horse run.
|
|
#16
02-23-2009, 06:43 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
if i have the opportunity, i put on hrtv for the day and watch the racing-and don't have a dime bet on it....
__________________
Books serve to show a man that those original thoughts of his aren't very new at all. Abraham Lincoln
|
|
#17
02-24-2009, 01:12 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I think I've mentioned before that I bought my first VCR in about 1985, and I have nearly every Triple Crown race personally recorded/captured since then. Ferdinand and Unbridled are probably two of my fave Derby's to watch....and THAT'S a tough choice. I had not watched the 1988 Winning Colors win in the program's entirety for quite some time. I was surprised and then delighted and then melancholy to see a very impressive and healthy Secretariat shown romping in his pasture in early 1988. I forgot that he was part of the original 1988 ABC derby telecast. In a minute, I'm gonna toss in the 1991 Kentucky Derby. I'd lose a trivia contest to name half the horses in the race at this exact moment. This Saturday or Sunday, I'll probably pick two or three races from Florida and/or California and wager some combo of about $100 to $150 on what I'll think in advance are good wagers for my style of betting for the day. That's the gambler in me. I know I'm a fan, too.
|
|
#18
02-24-2009, 01:23 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
And I watch races all the time without wagering on them, simply because I feel like I can learn things from watching a race from an objective point of view. There are sometimes nuances that I notice while watching races with no 'action' that I can then apply to my handicapping. You can never know too much IMO.
|
|
#19
02-24-2009, 09:11 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Plain and simple I think the answer is no. Have you ever seen someone in an OTB yelling for bad things to happen to a horse so they could cash? These people are by no means fans of the game. Racing is just an opportunity for action and the chance to make a buck. They don't care about any of the players involved. They are strictly gamblers.
__________________
Felix Unger talking to Oscar Madison: "Your horse could finish third by 20 lengths and they still pay you? And you have been losing money for all these years?!"
|
|
#20
02-24-2009, 11:18 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
making a occasional bet on the derby, super bowl, world series,etc which many people do at the office pool, or at the track or on-line, football cards,does not make them a gambler. A gambler can be respected or thought of as a bum,for instance. player who wins big money at a handicapping contest, do you think of him as a bum?,how about Andy beyer, John White, Steve Byk, Steve Crist? we think of them as sucessful, because they are.
people who gamble away their livelyhood,bill money,savings,and make life miserable for all around them, these are gambling bums, who have no direction and are gambling fools. I would say most golfers, hunters boaters,and skiers spend as much money a year on their passions as i do. Yes you can be a fan and sucessful bettor. Last edited by sdjcom : 02-24-2009 at 12:13 PM.
|
Linear Mode
