Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > Main Forum > The Paddock
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-26-2007, 09:41 AM
Late Fires's Avatar
Late Fires Late Fires is offline
Anothah Predetah
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Flea Market Montgomery
Posts: 501
Default Is "Liking the Surface" At Churchill Overrated?

One of the reasons that I like Street Sense, Circular Quay and Any Given Saturday so much in the Derby is that all are proven over the Churchill strip. But as I look back at past Derby winners, it seems that you have to go back to Lil E Tee to find a Derby winner that had won a race prior to the Derby at Churchill. Am I putting too much stock into the fact that a horse is proven to "like the surface" at Churchill?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-26-2007, 09:53 AM
ateamstupid's Avatar
ateamstupid ateamstupid is offline
Super Mod.. and Super Fly
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 13,036
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Late Fires
One of the reasons that I like Street Sense, Circular Quay and Any Given Saturday so much in the Derby is that all are proven over the Churchill strip. But as I look back at past Derby winners, it seems that you have to go back to Lil E Tee to find a Derby winner that had won a race prior to the Derby at Churchill. Am I putting too much stock into the fact that a horse is proven to "like the surface" at Churchill?
I think it's somewhat overrated in that just because a horse won a race over the track as 2-year-old doesn't mean he's going to run well over it in the Derby. It becomes almost a totally different track on Derby day. However, if you have a horse like Street Sense, who trains at Churchill, whose trainer is based at Churchill, whose rider knows the track inside and out and will be riding there all week before the Derby, then I think that certainly counts for something.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-26-2007, 09:55 AM
Kasept's Avatar
Kasept Kasept is offline
Steve Byk
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Greenwich, NY
Posts: 43,967
Default

No you're not. One problem has been however that taking to it or not taking to it has been random with those that make their first start at the Downs. It is frequently 'breakaway' cuppy and certain feet/action grab it and certain ones don't. But having experience over it, or at least having worked over it, is still a big plus to me in the Derby picture. The claim that the strip horses work on leading up to the Derby isn't the same as Derby Day is nonsensical.

When Mike Smith told me beore '05 that he expected a big try from Giacomo after his strong Santa Anita workout the Monday of Derby Week, one of the points he stressed was "all he needs to do is take to the surface"..
__________________
All ambitions are lawful except those which climb upward on the miseries or credulities of mankind. ~ Joseph Conrad
A long habit of not thinking a thing wrong, gives it a superficial appearance of being right. ~ Thomas Paine
Don't let anyone tell you that your dreams can't come true. They are only afraid that theirs won't and yours will. ~ Robert Evans
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command. ~ George Orwell, 1984.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-26-2007, 09:57 AM
lemoncrush's Avatar
lemoncrush lemoncrush is offline
Randwyck
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Blaine, MN
Posts: 1,408
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ateamstupid
I think it's somewhat overrated in that just because a horse won a race over the track as 2-year-old doesn't mean he's going to run well over it in the Derby. It becomes almost a totally different track on Derby day. However, if you have a horse like Street Sense, who trains at Churchill, whose trainer is based at Churchill, whose rider knows the track inside and out and will be riding there all week before the Derby, then I think that certainly counts for something.
I agree. It's certainly an angle that shouldn't be dismissed.
2 years ago, Don't Get Mad LOVED Churchill. He ended up winning the Derby trial, then wheeled back 1 week later and finished 4th (I believe) in the Derby.
I think you have to get SS credit for his BC win there, and you have to give CQ credit for his races there, as well as the long stretch to help him weave through traffic.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-26-2007, 09:58 AM
Pedigree Ann's Avatar
Pedigree Ann Pedigree Ann is offline
Churchill Downs
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 1,776
Default

What you want to watch out for is the horse who has trained and/or raced badly at CD. Horses who make heavy work of it getting over the surface, instead of moving smoothly. Skip Away never did run his race at CD, but could trounce the same horses elsewhere. It's like off tracks - it's not that some move up, it's that some absolutely can't run in it.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-26-2007, 10:04 AM
SniperSB23 SniperSB23 is offline
Hialeah Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Albany, NY
Posts: 6,086
Default

A better way to look at it is probably to focus on the years where the BC was at Churchill:

1988 BC Juvy
Is It True - DNR
Easy Goer - 2nd in Derby
Tagel - DNR

1991 BC Juvy
Arazi - 8th in Derby
Bertrando - DNR
Snappy Landing - 17th in Derby

1994 BC Juvy
Timber County - 3rd in Derby
Eltish - 6th in Derby
Tejano Run - 2nd in Derby

1998 BC Juvy
Answer Lively - 10th in Derby
Aly's Alley - DNR
Cat Thief - 3rd in Derby

2000 BC Juvy
Macho Uno - DNR
Point Given - 5th in Derby
Street Cry - DNR

Tough call, 1992 was obviously a disaster but otherwise the horses hitting the board in the BC Juvy have done fairly well when running in the Derby although they have produced zero Derby winners.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-26-2007, 10:04 AM
ateamstupid's Avatar
ateamstupid ateamstupid is offline
Super Mod.. and Super Fly
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 13,036
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kasept
The claim that the strip horses work on leading up to the Derby isn't the same as Derby Day is nonsensical.
I think the claim that the track isn't messed with a ton on Oaks and Derby day is nonsensical.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-26-2007, 10:19 AM
PPerfectfan's Avatar
PPerfectfan PPerfectfan is offline
Hippodrome Bluebonnets
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 714
Default

I think the fact that some horses love and have run well there plays alot into who I like. It is a fact in the past that some very, very nice horses run like crap there. Holy Bull being one of the biggest. Mike said he hated the track and I think he proved it Derby day. But the fact that SS trains there and won the BC there is just one small reason I love him for the Derby. And if CQ had run anytime in this century, I would have played him also. But the time off is just alittle to much for me.
__________________
Me and PP at Lanes End
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-26-2007, 03:03 PM
avance2000 avance2000 is offline
Tropical Park
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 285
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ateamstupid
I think the claim that the track isn't messed with a ton on Oaks and Derby day is nonsensical.
nope.
as usual, kasept is right.
__________________
the great avance has spoken.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-26-2007, 03:27 PM
pointman's Avatar
pointman pointman is offline
Saratoga
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 15,693
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kasept
No you're not. One problem has been however that taking to it or not taking to it has been random with those that make their first start at the Downs. It is frequently 'breakaway' cuppy and certain feet/action grab it and certain ones don't. But having experience over it, or at least having worked over it, is still a big plus to me in the Derby picture. The claim that the strip horses work on leading up to the Derby isn't the same as Derby Day is nonsensical.

When Mike Smith told me beore '05 that he expected a big try from Giacomo after his strong Santa Anita workout the Monday of Derby Week, one of the points he stressed was "all he needs to do is take to the surface"..
And hope that Bellamy Road gets injured and Afleet Alex has a bad trip. What I don't understand is why a trainer would not want to have at least one workout on the track before the Derby if his horse has never been on it just to familiarize the horse with the surface and see if the horse takes to it. What is your take on that Steve?
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 04-26-2007, 03:43 PM
ateamstupid's Avatar
ateamstupid ateamstupid is offline
Super Mod.. and Super Fly
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 13,036
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by avance2000
nope.
as usual, kasept is right.
A very thorough and convincing argument.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 04-26-2007, 03:49 PM
blackthroatedwind blackthroatedwind is offline
Jerome Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 9,938
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cardus
Skip Away is the best recent example.

Just ask Carolyn Hine if liking the CD surface is overrated.
I think those questions have to be presented to Gene Stevens first.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 04-26-2007, 03:53 PM
blackthroatedwind blackthroatedwind is offline
Jerome Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 9,938
Default

Wait, is the crux of Steve's argument based on something Mike Smith told him?

IMO the " he hated the track ", unless there is moiture involved, is at best the most ridiculous and overused argument in racing. It's phucking dirt.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 04-26-2007, 04:34 PM
cmorioles's Avatar
cmorioles cmorioles is offline
Santa Anita
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 3,169
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind
Wait, is the crux of Steve's argument based on something Mike Smith told him?

IMO the " he hated the track ", unless there is moiture involved, is at best the most ridiculous and overused argument in racing. It's phucking dirt.
But what if the dirt is "cuppy"?
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 04-26-2007, 04:45 PM
blackthroatedwind blackthroatedwind is offline
Jerome Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 9,938
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cmorioles
But what if the dirt is "cuppy"?

That's an entirely different story.

If a trainer says the track was cuppy that's a euphamism for " my horse sucked ".
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 04-26-2007, 05:11 PM
blackthroatedwind blackthroatedwind is offline
Jerome Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 9,938
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cardus
I'm drawing a blank on Gene Stevens. Some help here?

You've never been so lucky.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 04-26-2007, 05:17 PM
parsixfarms parsixfarms is offline
Churchill Downs
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Saratoga Springs
Posts: 1,779
Default

[quote=Kasept]The claim that the strip horses work on leading up to the Derby isn't the same as Derby Day is nonsensical.

QUOTE]

I have to disagree. Yes, they are still working/running on the Churchill Downs main track. However, to suggest that the "souped-up" race track that typically rears its ugly head on Oaks/Derby Day is the same grade, etc., as the track that horses train over in the weeks prior to the Derby is ignoring the obvious. And the fact that Street Sense and few others are currently on the grounds suggests that the trainers (especially Barclay Tagg) give an awful lot of credence to this "claim."
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 04-26-2007, 05:39 PM
hoovesupsideyourhead's Avatar
hoovesupsideyourhead hoovesupsideyourhead is offline
"The Kentucky Killing Machine"
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: florida
Posts: 16,278
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind
Wait, is the crux of Steve's argument based on something Mike Smith told him?

IMO the " he hated the track ", unless there is moiture involved, is at best the most ridiculous and overused argument in racing. It's phucking dirt.
lmfao the wind speaks......
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.