![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() strange ml. i was hoping for a much better price on kd. they are REALLLLY high on this horse and they are expecting a huge effort.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() they told me the jock who had been riding him in texas was able to get off his mounts and is going to ride him. the jocks name is quincy hamilton
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() you continue to make points I don't get. You like the fact that showing up raced in a big field and has gained that experience and are willing to disregard that he has never had experience racing on the turf. It is impossible to forecast a horse to gallop when never been over a surface in race conditions. The size of the field also helps KD more than SU because kd will be on the lead while SU will have to work his way through traffic. Not sure I am getting your points
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
http://www.facebook.com/cajungator26 |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Morning lines are no more than one person's opinion of what the odds will be when the race goes off. If you asked 5 guys to set the morning line for this race, you'd probably get 5 different prices on Kip Deville and Showing Up, ranging from 9/2 to 8/1 on Kip, and 5/2 to 6/1 on Showing Up.
Not sure why anyone even looks at them. They are definetly no barometer to gauge a race's odds. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "I can assure you of one thing, Showing Up is a better horse on the turf than on the dirt."
Why? Because one person thinks so? I mean the horse worked brilliantly on grass. Big deal, so do a lot of dirt horses who make the switch. Doesnt mean the horse will take to the grass in a 12 horse field when the gates open. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "No rational person can think Showing Up will go off at 6-1."
I totally agree Boldruler. This horse has no shot of going off at 6/1. Who is this fool who set the line? |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
The horse has an explosive turn of foot. The guys at Belmont were kidding and saying Barbaro was lucky Showing Up never got a shot at him on the turf because it would have been a dogfight. Considering Barbaro was arguably the best 3yr old turf horse in a decade, I like what I have been hearing about the Jackson's horse. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]() If Showing Up could have been that competitive with Barbaro on the turf and Barbaro was one arguably the best 3 year old turfer in a decade, think of what Showing Up will do against these gerbils. Should be a mortal lock.
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Yeah, ok, sure. The same barn has also told us 100 times that Funny Cide was all set and fixed up and ready to fire a huge shot right before all the losses.
So I'm supposed to empty out on a horse because the same barn says so? No thanks. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I like Showing Up as a horse, and I think he will do very well in next year's Met Mile, but I am dubious of his chances against top competition at any distance over a mile.
As for accepting based on opinions of his connections that he will excel on the grass, I'm strongly in Mike's corner, as working on the grass and racing on it are two totally different things. I will happily bet against him at what will probably be very underlaid odds this weekend based on reputation. He will beat me first time on the grass, especially at 1 3/16ths, as horses like Showing Up dramatically underperform their odds in these types of situations. The funny thing is that in my heart I will probably be rooting for him but making money in this game is not about rooting with your heart. Showing Up is a bad bet in this race at any odds under 6-1 and probably at odds under 10-1. |
#18
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
http://www.facebook.com/cajungator26 |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
The simple fact is that Showing Up's odds will not reflect his chances of winning. Not even close. If he was 30-1 I would make a huge win bet on him. His chances of winning are certainly greater than 3.33%. What I don't believe is that they are substantially greater than 10%. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|