![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Interesting article, especially towards the end.
http://www.american.com/archive/2008.../triple-threat So my question is this: is there some validity to the proposal to end the ban on artificial insemination? I admittedly don't know a lot about why this ban exists. I know they artificially inseminate standardbreds. Is it to protect the breeding industry? If so, doesn't seem like a good reason -- would definately be a new paradigm, but the breeding industry would still exist. Is it to assure control over and absolute certainty about the bloodline? If so, also doesn't seem like a good reason -- there's plenty of ways to put security measures in place, and then there's always genetic testing. If sperm could be harvested, wouldn't that allow the star horse to continue racing, develop a following, and generate some long-term enthusiasm about the sport with a new fan base?
__________________
Ticket Seller: All kind of balls... Bodyguard: One of his is crystal. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
But you're right about there being little upside, economically speaking, to continue racing when the value is at it's peak. As far as the risk of something happening to a horse that continues racing..well, life is risk. It may happen, but most times it probably won't and the benefits of having a reliable star, as opposed to a shooting comet, may be worth the risk. Anyway, since when are you afraid about what a bunch of crazies think? The DeeTee partners aren't crazy enough for you?
__________________
Ticket Seller: All kind of balls... Bodyguard: One of his is crystal. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Sure, I understand what PETA-type people might say. That the "greedy" owners not only got rich from the harvested sperm, they wanted even more money so they kept racing the horse until it broke down. Some arguments against that are 1) if the owners were only concerned about getting rich, they wouldn't continue to race the horse in order avoid the possibility of the sperm being devalued if the horse then lost races (the point you made above), 2) the money made from breeding is so much greater, it makes most, if not all, race purses inconsequential in the grand economic scheme of things (Storm Cat earned $570,610 on the track, but he was pulling down, what, $35 million a year at stud?), and 3) if the owners got plenty of air time and showed that they were continuing to race the horse for the fans and love of the sport, I think people would see that their intentions were pure. You've got to fight demagoguery with logic and common sense (and good PR). If you make decisions based upon what you fear the crazies might say, then you've already lost the fight against them.
__________________
Ticket Seller: All kind of balls... Bodyguard: One of his is crystal. |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]() How would you ensure the integrity of the breed? How would they know 1000% that the sperm that was being used was indeed the real deal. I would imagine that you would open up a whole new can of worms.
|