![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Yesterday's Pick Six featured a $133.80 winner, an $18 winner, a $6 winner, a $31.60 winner, an $11 winner and a $5.80 winner. A win parlay with those six winners would have paid $910,411, yet the Pick Six pool was just $198,417, AND IT WAS STILL HIT by one ticket.
Not impossible, but according to Brad Free, that lone winning ticket had the first four winners ($133.80, $18, $6, $31.60) all SINGLED. Weird. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() WOW! That is insane. Does anyone know how the rest of the ticket was structured?
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Not sure.
I know the Breeders Cup Fix 6 winning ticket consisted of four straight singles, followed by two ALL-ALL's. I think it's pretty amusing that someone singled a 65/1 shot in leg one of pick six!...if this is true. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Quote:
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Ateam - certainly does raise some eyebrows. Maybe the person(s) who singled the horse in Leg A had a connection to the horse so they had to single him. It was just a $16 ticket. Either good handicapping or luck or both.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I've played this game for the better half of my life and I've never heard of someone singling a 60-1 shot and having it win, much less, having it be one of four straight singles and then hitting the pick 6.
I would like to know the percentages of that happening. Virtually impossible for me to believe. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
But yeah, just the concept of singling a 65/1 shot in leg 1 of a P6 is virtually unheard of. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]() If this were like the original scam, it means they knew the winners of the first four legs when the tickets were punched. The mistake the idiots the first time made was in the structure. If they had included some losers in the first few legs, nobody would have noticed.
I can't believe someone would try the same thing and make the same stupid mistake. |