Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > Main Forum > The Paddock
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-11-2006, 08:48 AM
Revolution's Avatar
Revolution Revolution is offline
Hawthorne
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 524
Default Polytrack vs Dirt Debate

This is a serious thread. I am very interested to see legitimate arguments for each surface. I am going to make the argument for polytrack (which is 90% sand).

1) Data from Europe and the US shows it has drastically cut down on breakdowns. "It's like galloping on a cloud."

2) It has cut veterinary bills by 50%.

3) It has increased field size.

4) It saves $500,000 a year on track maintenance. (for a non-profit that money might be used for purses)

5) Don't have to worry about muddy racetracks.

6) It makes horse racing more international. Europeans are more likely to come to America to race over a surface they are familiar with.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-11-2006, 09:04 AM
dellinger63's Avatar
dellinger63 dellinger63 is offline
Keeneland
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 10,072
Default

I would like to see the articles and facts you base your points (footnotes)

I don't have a dog in this fight and am open minded to the change but I don't see any field size change at KEE (only poly I play with regularity) and haven't seen any change in breakdowns.

I will agree though the maintainance costs are cheaper (for the track owners) and this may be the number 1 factor in going poly.

By the way I also prefer to see football and baseball on grass instead of astroturf but 'the times they are a changing'.

Hope we never see the day when hockey is played on soft plastic rather than ice which is camparible IMO.
__________________
“To compel a man to furnish funds for the propagation of ideas he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical.” Thomas Jefferson
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-11-2006, 09:07 AM
Revolution's Avatar
Revolution Revolution is offline
Hawthorne
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 524
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dellinger63
I would like to see the articles and facts you base your points (footnotes)

I don't have a dog in this fight and am open minded to the change but I don't see any field size change at KEE (only poly I play with regularity) and haven't seen any change in breakdowns.

I will agree though the maintainance costs are cheaper (for the track owners) and this may be the number 1 factor in going poly.

By the way I also prefer to see football and baseball on grass instead of astroturf but 'the times they are a changing'.

Hope we never see the day when hockey is played on soft plastic rather than ice which is camparible IMO.

This article has most of my data. There are others and I will see what I can post, but this article is excellent for data. I believe in facts, not worthless opinion based on nothing.

http://www.usatoday.com/sports/horse...eeneland_x.htm
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-11-2006, 09:19 AM
Cannon Shell's Avatar
Cannon Shell Cannon Shell is offline
Sha Tin
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 20,855
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Revolution
This is a serious thread. I am very interested to see legitimate arguments for each surface. I am going to make the argument for polytrack (which is 90% sand).

1) Data from Europe and the US shows it has drastically cut down on breakdowns. "It's like galloping on a cloud."

2) It has cut veterinary bills by 50%.

3) It has increased field size.

4) It saves $500,000 a year on track maintenance. (for a non-profit that money might be used for purses)

5) Don't have to worry about muddy racetracks.

6) It makes horse racing more international. Europeans are more likely to come to America to race over a surface they are familiar with.
Point #1 - most likely will cutdown on breakdowns a large degree
Point #2- Vet bills overall should decrease but I dont know if 50% would be accurate
Point #3- It has absolutely increased field size at Turfway and Keeneland.
Point #4- It will cut down on track maintenance costs but I doubt that money will be flowing elsewhere.
Point #5- No more mud or slop, which will help the breakdown numbers
Point #6- Foreign horses are more apt to try our bigger races if run on Poly.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-11-2006, 09:41 AM
dellinger63's Avatar
dellinger63 dellinger63 is offline
Keeneland
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 10,072
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Revolution
This article has most of my data. There are others and I will see what I can post, but this article is excellent for data. I believe in facts, not worthless opinion based on nothing.

http://www.usatoday.com/sports/horse...eeneland_x.htm
Thanks for posting the proof in the article. It did open my eyes further. Guess I can put aside my need for nostalgia for the sake of the T-breds's health.
Very good post
__________________
“To compel a man to furnish funds for the propagation of ideas he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical.” Thomas Jefferson
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-11-2006, 10:07 AM
Revolution's Avatar
Revolution Revolution is offline
Hawthorne
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 524
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaHoss9698
I was hoping we could have another one of these threads around here. There really hasn't been enough poly debate, thanks!!
Actually there has been little debate. Just opinions without facts. I am still waiting for the other side of the argument against poly. Apparently there is none.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-11-2006, 10:11 AM
Cajungator26's Avatar
Cajungator26 Cajungator26 is offline
Keeneland
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Hossy's Mom's basement.
Posts: 10,217
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Revolution
Actually there has been little debate. Just opinions without facts. I am still waiting for the other side of the argument against poly. Apparently there is none.
Check the other ten threads...
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-11-2006, 10:12 AM
Gander Gander is offline
Del Mar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,336
Default

Ahhh, yet another polytrack thread! I am so stoked I logged on this morning.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-11-2006, 10:19 AM
disappearingdan_akaplaya's Avatar
disappearingdan_akaplaya disappearingdan_akaplaya is offline
Gulfstream Park
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: chicago
Posts: 1,217
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cannon Shell
Point #1 - most likely will cutdown on breakdowns a large degree
Point #2- Vet bills overall should decrease but I dont know if 50% would be accurate
Point #3- It has absolutely increased field size at Turfway and Keeneland.
Point #4- It will cut down on track maintenance costs but I doubt that money will be flowing elsewhere.
Point #5- No more mud or slop, which will help the breakdown numbers
Point #6- Foreign horses are more apt to try our bigger races if run on Poly.


ive been a supporter of polytrack but field sizes have been and always will be large at keeneland regardless of the surface.......the horsemen arent gonna hide from running for that much money! vet bills obviously will decrease as far as injuries go but i think thats dependent on the trainer becuase some trainers will use the vet more than others every month on the animal whether he or she is sound or not and for legal and illegal purposes. track maintenance is less costly but here in illinois atleast with arlington one of their gripes with poly is the initial coast of installing it
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-06-2006, 04:42 PM
JJP JJP is offline
Gulfstream Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,220
Default

Rumor has it Arlington will announce tomorrow that it will be installing a synthetic surface.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 12-06-2006, 04:46 PM
Crown@club's Avatar
Crown@club Crown@club is offline
Randwyck
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Newburgh, IN
Posts: 1,492
Default

What?! This is not in the Polytrack room?! How dare ye!

LOL! j/k
__________________
"I don't feel like that I am any better than anybody else" - Paul Newman
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-06-2006, 05:56 PM
Dunbar's Avatar
Dunbar Dunbar is offline
The Curragh
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,962
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crown@club
What?! This is not in the Polytrack room?! How dare ye!

LOL! j/k
I suspect it will be there soon enough. My over/under estimate is 9:30pmEST

--Dunbar
__________________
Curlin and Hard Spun finish 1,2 in the 2007 BC Classic, demonstrating how competing in all three Triple Crown races ruins a horse for the rest of the year...see avatar
photo from REUTERS/Lucas Jackson
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:46 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.