|  |  | 
|  | 
| 
			 
			#1  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|  Del Mar outshines Saratoga better quality racing, and a better track in the best setting | 
| 
			 
			#2  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 | |||
|   Quote: 
 | 
| 
			 
			#3  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   They could hold the Saratoga meet in the middle of Idaho and it would be better than Del Mar. Who cares where the setting is? If they paved out a racetrack at our local dump and had the quality that they do at Saratoga, I would be there for sure. | 
| 
			 
			#4  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 | |||
|   I think someone is suffering from delusions due to the excessive heat. Each location has its strong points, but for the racing quality you've got to go with the Spa. | 
| 
			 
			#5  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 | |||
|   Seattle likes the attention his ridiculous posts provide..he is like a dog, ignore him and he will knock it off and actually contribute something worthwhile | 
| 
			 
			#6  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 | |||
|   I have been to both and the racing at Saratoga is far superior to Del Mar.  Del Mar is a better time overall because of the city it is located in, but the racing at the spa is just better.  The weather though goes to DelMar in a landslide.  Only the Keeneland meet is comparble, and Saratoga is still a little better than Keeneland. | 
| 
			 
			#7  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 | |||
|   I live an hour north of Del Mar.. never have been to Saratoga.  As a horse player.. I'll take Saratoga every time.. For a good time.. You'd be hard pressed to find a better place than Del Mar. It is awesome. | 
| 
			 
			#8  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 | |||
|   Quote: 
 | 
| 
			 
			#9  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 | |||
|   The guy is just stupid and should be ignored. | 
|  | 
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| 
 | 
 |