Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > The Steve Dellinger Discourse Den
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-25-2012, 01:03 PM
Danzig Danzig is offline
Dee Tee Stables
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: The Natural State
Posts: 29,940
Default health ruling thursday

so, does it stand or does it go???
__________________
Books serve to show a man that those original thoughts of his aren't very new at all.
Abraham Lincoln
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-25-2012, 01:25 PM
bigrun's Avatar
bigrun bigrun is offline
Del Mar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: VA/PA/KY
Posts: 5,063
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Danzig View Post
so, does it stand or does it go???
Saw a great cartoon yesterday and can't find it now...pic of SCOTUS with 5 having elephant heads and 4 with donkey heads...precurser of the vote..

Few others..In the 2nd pic, check the dog gasping for breath..











__________________
"If you lose the power to laugh, you lose the power to think" - Clarence Darrow, American lawyer (1857-1938)

When you are right, no one remembers;when you are wrong, no one forgets.

Thought for today.."No persons are more frequently wrong, than those who will not admit
they are wrong" - Francois, Duc de la Rochefoucauld, French moralist (1613-1680)
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-25-2012, 04:51 PM
Riot's Avatar
Riot Riot is offline
Keeneland
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 14,153
Default

I'll stick with my original guess, based upon what the lawyers, scholars and even conservative lower court judges said about it's unquestioned constitutionality when the case first went to the Supremes: 5 to 4 upheld as Constitutional.

At worse, best guesses seem to be only the mandate overturned - which wouldn't be a bad thing, because then we can press immediately for Medicare/single payer for every American.

If they overthrew the whole thing, millions of Americans will suddenly be uninsured, in the middle of their cancer treatments, etc.

None of the legal eagles seem to think they will just throw it out as not yet suitable for review, as the mandate hasn't yet kicked in.

Although Scalia wrote a really, really weird dissenting opinion about one of their other rulings today, stepping clearly into politics.
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-25-2012, 06:00 PM
Coach Pants
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Socialized health care. Hitler enticed the Austrians with it. Just gradually taking away our rights...like Hitler.

Just read stories of Austrians during WWII and how awful health care coverage was under Hitler. How medical research at Austrian universities came to a grinding halt.

FEMA camps are real. History repeats itself. We are going down a similar path.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-25-2012, 06:45 PM
Riot's Avatar
Riot Riot is offline
Keeneland
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 14,153
Default

The interesting trick is that the individual mandate is a 100% Republican-created idea for self-responsibility and self-pay. "Everyone buys his own insurance, and stops freeloading off the rest of us"

The insurance companies loved it, as it gives them millions of new customers.

Republicans have spent 25 years activing pushing for the individual mandate in health care, supported by the insurance companies. Yes: Republicans have spent the last 25 years pushing to force every American that can afford it to buy health insurance: "Just like auto insurance", the GOP used to argue. "We don't want to pay for their visits to the ER when they don't have insurance", the GOP said.

The only reason Obama dropped single-payer so readily (much to the consternation of the left), and went with the individual mandate, was because he thought he'd then get Republican support for their 100% Republican health-care plan. Wrong. The GOP were out to screw him, so they abandoned their own health care mandate plan they'd supported and pushed for decades.

But it will be interesting to see what the conservative Supremes say about the Heritage Foundations 100% Republican "individual mandate".
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-25-2012, 08:39 PM
ArlJim78 ArlJim78 is offline
Newmarket
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,549
Default

What a load of nonsense. Some Republicans (a small minority) have been for the IM. That doesn't make it a "100% Republican idea", and the idea that this is something that Republicans have been pushing for 25 years is preposterous. Yes some did advocate for it but they were shot down by the majority who wanted no part of it.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-25-2012, 08:43 PM
Danzig Danzig is offline
Dee Tee Stables
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: The Natural State
Posts: 29,940
Default

and once upon a time, obama was against the individual mandate. he took ol' hillary to task back when they were both vying for the democratic nomination for daring to suggest such a thing. boy, he changed his tune.
but then he also changed his tune on many other things.
gitmo
bushes tax cuts
having a transparent administration
not kowtowing to big business (look at the deals cut with pharma on the ppuca)

then there was his 'the economy is the #1 priority' line of bs. yeah, then he turned around and made health care the big priority. all that work, and the thing is most likely going right down the drain on thursday.
it's not that he's a liar, it's that he's a politician. no hope of change, pols are pols first, last and always. the shame is that some suckers believed him.
__________________
Books serve to show a man that those original thoughts of his aren't very new at all.
Abraham Lincoln
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-25-2012, 08:59 PM
Riot's Avatar
Riot Riot is offline
Keeneland
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 14,153
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ArlJim78 View Post
What a load of nonsense. Some Republicans (a small minority) have been for the IM. That doesn't make it a "100% Republican idea", and the idea that this is something that Republicans have been pushing for 25 years is preposterous. Yes some did advocate for it but they were shot down by the majority who wanted no part of it.
The individual mandate was created by the Republican Heritage Foundation, and yes, the Republicans - including the majority leaders, such as Newt - have embraced the individual mandate since they were against the Clinton health care reforms. The insurance industry lobbyists have always supported it (they even have during Obama) The GOP has indeed pushed the mandate very hard during the 1990's and 2000's. It's all about "buy your own insurance, be responsible for yourself".

Yes, the GOP "is" the individual mandate. Democrats always hated it as they considered it a giveaway to the private insurance companies (and why progressives didn't like it when Obama embraced it to try and get something passed for the first time ever)

Every president of the past 60 years had said our health insurance model needed major reform. Finally we have a start.
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-25-2012, 09:19 PM
Riot's Avatar
Riot Riot is offline
Keeneland
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 14,153
Default

As Ezra Klein says:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/busine...w2V_story.html

Quote:
But permission structures aren’t just for elections. Over the past two years, the Republican Party has slowly been building a permission structure for the five Republicans on the Supreme Court to feel comfortable doing something nobody thought they could do: Violate the existing understanding of the commerce clause and, in perhaps the most significant moment of judicial activism since the New Deal, overturn either all or part of the Affordable Care Act.

The first step was perhaps the hardest: The Republican Party had to take an official and unanimous stand against the constitutionality of the individual mandate. Typically, it’s not that difficult for the opposition party to oppose the least popular element in the majority party’s signature initiative. But the individual mandate was a policy idea Republicans had thought of in the late 1980s and supported for two decades. They had to, in effect, persuade every Republican to say that the policy they had been supporting was an unconstitutional assault on liberty.
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-25-2012, 11:23 PM
Riot's Avatar
Riot Riot is offline
Keeneland
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 14,153
Default

History of the individual mandate

The concept of the individual health insurance mandate is considered to have originated in 1989 at the conservative Heritage Foundation. In 1993, Republicans twice introduced health care bills that contained an individual health insurance mandate. Advocates for those bills included prominent Republicans who today oppose the mandate including Orrin Hatch (R-UT), Charles Grassley (R-IA), Robert Bennett (R-UT), and Christopher Bond (R-MO).

First introduction of the individual mandate:

November, 1993 Consumer Choice Healthy Security Act
Sponsored by Senator Don Nickles (R-OK) & 24 Republican cosponsors

November, 1993 Health Equity and Access Reform Today Act
Sponsored by Senator John H. Chafee (R-RI) & 20 cosponsors (18-R, 2D)

http://healthcarereform.procon.org/v...ourceID=004182
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.