Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > Main Forum > The Paddock
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-30-2009, 09:21 AM
Kasept's Avatar
Kasept Kasept is offline
Steve Byk
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Greenwich, NY
Posts: 43,989
Default Rees addresses AGSC omission of Clark as G1 citing 'bias'..

How can the Clark still be a Grade II?
http://www.courier-journal.com/blogs...-grade-ii.html

But wait... Instead of simply laying out the reasonable case for making the Clark a G1, she can't help but talk about 'bias' for East and West Coast interests...

"I really believe there is institutional bias built into the system, where New York and California have the advantage because those tracks have more graded races, which means more of their horses are graded placed, which helps those races keep their grading."

There's no AGSC bias more tilted than the one toward Lexington... I love Jennie, but the Committee kowtows to Keeneland like nobody's business. There has been constant pell mell upping of the grades of events at Keeneland for no especially apparent reason.

If she wants the Clark upped to a Grade 1, which I have no issue with, doesn't the Blue Grass deserve at this point to be reduced to a Grade 2? Or have General Quarters, Monba and Dominican done too much to keep the Blue Grass' reputation pristine?
__________________
All ambitions are lawful except those which climb upward on the miseries or credulities of mankind. ~ Joseph Conrad
A long habit of not thinking a thing wrong, gives it a superficial appearance of being right. ~ Thomas Paine
Don't let anyone tell you that your dreams can't come true. They are only afraid that theirs won't and yours will. ~ Robert Evans
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command. ~ George Orwell, 1984.

Last edited by Kasept : 11-30-2009 at 10:22 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-30-2009, 09:51 AM
brianwspencer's Avatar
brianwspencer brianwspencer is offline
Atlantic City Race Course
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 4,894
Default

I read this late last night and think she has a really valid point. Not so certain about having a point on the 'bias,' but there doesn't seem to be a whole lot of reason the Clark isn't a Grade I, especially when it was a Grade I and Premium Tap won it....making it worthy of downgrading?

I also remember really liking this:

Quote:
Why, for instance, are there so few graded sprints in the Midwest? Because there are so few graded sprints in the Midwest.
It's an interesting enough thought experiment.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-30-2009, 10:00 AM
Travis Stone's Avatar
Travis Stone Travis Stone is offline
Oaklawn
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 2,229
Default

The graded stakes system boils down to the Arkansas Derby not being a grade one.

And she's right in that it feeds the big tracks, because points are earned by finishing well in graded races, which are mostly at the big tracks, so they feed each other and the cycle continues.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-30-2009, 10:14 AM
DaTruth's Avatar
DaTruth DaTruth is offline
Churchill Downs
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 1,969
Default

I've often thought that Fair Grounds has been shortchanged by the Graded Stakes Committee. In particular, the FG Oaks should be a Grade 1.
__________________
Still trying to outsmart me, aren't you, mule-skinner? You want me to think that you don't want me to go down there, but the subtle truth is you really don't want me to go down there!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-30-2009, 10:28 AM
PatCummings PatCummings is offline
Randwyck
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: DubaiRaceNight.com
Posts: 1,263
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Travis Stone
The graded stakes system boils down to the Arkansas Derby not being a grade one.
BINGO
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-30-2009, 10:31 AM
Cannon Shell's Avatar
Cannon Shell Cannon Shell is offline
Sha Tin
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 20,855
Default

let's face it the grading sysem is screwed up and the influx of more big slots money races at non traditional venues will continue to skew the system even further. The Miesque being a grade 3 and the BC juvy filly turf being ungraded is stupid. I know about the criteria but some of that smae criteria leads the Arky Derby not to be a grade 1 also. According to the graded stakes committee Tapitsfly is not a graded winner but Jailot is. Obvious prep races like the Derby preps are the same grade as the target is. It is just tiresome to think about.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-30-2009, 10:34 AM
johnny pinwheel johnny pinwheel is offline
Woodbine
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: saratoga ny
Posts: 986
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kasept
How can the Clark still be a Grade II?
http://www.courier-journal.com/blogs...-grade-ii.html

But wait... Instead of simply laying out the reasonable case for making the Clark a G1, she can't help but talk about 'bias' for East and West Coast interests...

"I really believe there is institutional bias built into the system, where New York and California have the advantage because those tracks have more graded races, which means more of their horses are graded placed, which helps those races keep their grading."

There's no AGSC bias more tilted than the one toward Lexington... I love Jennie, but the Committee kowtows to Keeneland like nobody's business. There has been constant pell mell upping of the grades of events at Keeneland for no especially apparent reason.

If she wants the Clark upped to a Grade 1, which I have no issue with, doesn't the Blue Grass deserve at this point to be reduced to a Grade 2? Or has General Quarters, Monba and Dominican done too much to keep the Blue Grass' reputation pristine?
i agree the blue grass is a non-prep event now and should be downgraded while the arkansas derby upgraded. keenland can blame the polycrap for that. the horses that win the blue grass have virtually no shot now at the derby. they usually run in the back of the pack. as for the events with the "older" horses included. the whole grade, 1, 2 or 3 system is a joke. there are not enough 4 yo's and up to fill the criteria. heck as far as grade ones go theres hardly none running this year. most retire after the 3 yo campaign. years ago, horses like macho again and bullsbay would be grade 3 at best. the smaller tracks she champions for are another part of the problem. i'll use gone astray as an example. he could not even win a grade 3 in ny but won a million dollar race in the penn. derby against garbage. thats why the bigger tracks get the preference. gone astray won two overhyped races against inferior competition. his competition in those races would have trouble winning allowance races here. thats the reason those big tracks get preference, the level of comp. my opinion is the whole grade 1, grade 2, grade 3 thing should be scrapped. half the time i can't see the difference. theres such a lack of strong horses that the "good" ones can show up in any of the three categories especially in the older ranks. where grade one is just a higher number on the same old bunch.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-30-2009, 11:10 AM
philcski's Avatar
philcski philcski is offline
Goodwood
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Mission Viejo, CA
Posts: 8,872
Default

She is a good writer but definitely not a lawyer. Terrible arguments in this piece. The Clark should absolutely be a Grade 1 but not for the reasons she "stated".
__________________
please use generalizations and non-truths when arguing your side, thank you
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-30-2009, 11:45 AM
freddymo freddymo is offline
Belmont Park
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 7,091
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cannon Shell
let's face it the grading sysem is screwed up and the influx of more big slots money races at non traditional venues will continue to skew the system even further. The Miesque being a grade 3 and the BC juvy filly turf being ungraded is stupid. I know about the criteria but some of that smae criteria leads the Arky Derby not to be a grade 1 also. According to the graded stakes committee Tapitsfly is not a graded winner but Jailot is. Obvious prep races like the Derby preps are the same grade as the target is. It is just tiresome to think about.
Half these Graded races are frauds. TOO MANY GRADED STAKES PERIOD
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-30-2009, 12:47 PM
GBBob GBBob is offline
Hialeah Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,341
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by freddymo
Half these Graded races are frauds. TOO MANY GRADED STAKES PERIOD
Yeah..you know you would run in a Grade 7 at Penn if they had it
__________________
"but there's just no point in trying to predict when the narcissits finally figure out they aren't living in the most important time ever."
hi im god quote
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 11-30-2009, 01:12 PM
parsixfarms parsixfarms is offline
Churchill Downs
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Saratoga Springs
Posts: 1,779
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by freddymo
Half these Graded races are frauds. TOO MANY GRADED STAKES PERIOD
I agree. The issue shouldn't be whether the Clark deserves to be a Grade I (it probably doesn't - it's really been helped the past two years by the Breeders' Cup being out west), but rather how many stakes races that are currently given Grade I status don't deserve that grade.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-30-2009, 01:12 PM
freddymo freddymo is offline
Belmont Park
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 7,091
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GBBob
Yeah..you know you would run in a Grade 7 at Penn if they had it
took my son Saturday..Its a casino with a track. The back stretch is ok my son loved feeding the horse. 63 BSF dont quality for much although the Remsen was a 82..lol
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11-30-2009, 03:39 PM
Cannon Shell's Avatar
Cannon Shell Cannon Shell is offline
Sha Tin
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 20,855
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by freddymo
Half these Graded races are frauds. TOO MANY GRADED STAKES PERIOD
You are right
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11-30-2009, 04:40 PM
pba1817 pba1817 is offline
Hawthorne
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 541
Default

It sure does seem like there are too many Graded events when roughly 75% of these races the average field is 7.

The system should reflect the connections of high quality horses NOT being given the luxury of "picking" and "choosing" garden spots. They should feel like they are somewhat limited to run in the bigger races, not having the choices at their leisure.

I think racing would benefit in this event...
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.