Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > Main Forum > The Paddock
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-06-2007, 05:00 PM
Downthestretch55 Downthestretch55 is offline
Hialeah Park
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Stamford, NY
Posts: 4,618
Default Trainer-Jockey angle

I'm not sure that this belongs in this forum, but I've seen this before and commented on it.
Any time Coa rides for Contessa, something good happens.
I saw that in the 8th today, Coa rode for Contessa. Metro Meteor- winner.
Just a "heads up". When you see Coa/Contessa, well...take it from there.
It's a combination that brings out the best.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-06-2007, 07:22 PM
XIIPointStables XIIPointStables is offline
Washington Park
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 858
Default

Off topic, but I've noticed (and hit) and a bunch of Contessa "Mud Calks" horses.

I don't even know what mud calks are or if I'm spelling it right, but its hit for me a few times, especially when Gryder was still in NY.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-06-2007, 08:03 PM
Swale84 Swale84 is offline
Louisiana Downs
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 343
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by XIIPointStables
Off topic, but I've noticed (and hit) and a bunch of Contessa "Mud Calks" horses.

I don't even know what mud calks are or if I'm spelling it right, but its hit for me a few times, especially when Gryder was still in NY.
Contessa usually runs all of his horses with mud caulks on
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-06-2007, 08:11 PM
Rupert Pupkin Rupert Pupkin is offline
Del Mar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,102
Default

The good thing nowadays is that all these stats are listed in the DRF. The combination of Contessa/Coa has won at a 16% clip in 2006-2007. The ROI with this combination is $1.56 for every $2.00 wagered. That means you would lose 22% on your money if you wagered on this combination every time in the last 1 1/2 years. The mutual take in New York is about 15% on WPS bets. That means that you would lose 15% on your money with the average trainer/jockey combination. Since you would lose 22% on your money with Contessa/Coa, that means that this has not been a good combination to bet on over the last 1 1/2 years. If you were an owner and had horses with Contessa, you couldn't complain about the Contessa/Coa combination over the last 1 1/2 years. Winning at a 16% clip is not bad. That is better than average. It's just from a betting perspective that the ROI is not very good with that combination.

I can't find any data on the Levine/Prado combo.

Last edited by Rupert Pupkin : 06-06-2007 at 08:29 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-06-2007, 08:14 PM
Rudeboyelvis Rudeboyelvis is offline
Belmont Park
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 7,440
Default

They were money at BEL last fall, and the first part of the inner....Don't know if they've had a falling out since, or if his stable isn't what it was, but Alan Garcia seems to be getting the majority of the rides these days, and doing quite well on them.

Mud calks are small cleats that they add to the shoe for bite. Depending on the step of the horse, they may use quarter inch bended shoes instead.

Contessa uses them almost exclusively at BEL unless there is a reason the horse won't take to them.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-07-2007, 08:47 AM
Downthestretch55 Downthestretch55 is offline
Hialeah Park
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Stamford, NY
Posts: 4,618
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rupert Pupkin
The good thing nowadays is that all these stats are listed in the DRF. The combination of Contessa/Coa has won at a 16% clip in 2006-2007. The ROI with this combination is $1.56 for every $2.00 wagered. That means you would lose 22% on your money if you wagered on this combination every time in the last 1 1/2 years. The mutual take in New York is about 15% on WPS bets. That means that you would lose 15% on your money with the average trainer/jockey combination. Since you would lose 22% on your money with Contessa/Coa, that means that this has not been a good combination to bet on over the last 1 1/2 years. If you were an owner and had horses with Contessa, you couldn't complain about the Contessa/Coa combination over the last 1 1/2 years. Winning at a 16% clip is not bad. That is better than average. It's just from a betting perspective that the ROI is not very good with that combination.

I can't find any data on the Levine/Prado combo.
Rupert,
Thanks for taking the time to explain.
I can't argue with the numbers and stand corrected.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-07-2007, 09:07 AM
philcski's Avatar
philcski philcski is offline
Goodwood
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Mission Viejo, CA
Posts: 8,872
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Downthestretch55
I'm not sure that this belongs in this forum, but I've seen this before and commented on it.
Any time Coa rides for Contessa, something good happens.
I saw that in the 8th today, Coa rode for Contessa. Metro Meteor- winner.
Just a "heads up". When you see Coa/Contessa, well...take it from there.
It's a combination that brings out the best.
Contessa-Garcia-Winning Move stable crushed the Aqueduct meet. I expect the same next year.
__________________
please use generalizations and non-truths when arguing your side, thank you
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-07-2007, 09:37 AM
SentToStud's Avatar
SentToStud SentToStud is offline
Arlington Park
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 4,065
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by philcski
Contessa-Garcia-Winning Move stable crushed the Aqueduct meet. I expect the same next year.
I think the owner part of the combo is the most important factor. All the trainer , jock and jock/trainer percentage and ROI info is all very well organized and widely available and, in essence, is worked into the tote board. . The owner part of the equation is not but it's very important; to me, the most significantespecially in claiming races and at mid-level tracks. Formulator helps here if you use it but I tried it and it's cumbersome. It takes me a lot of time to track this and keep it current where I play but I think it's worthwhile. It's also a big reason I find it unwise to play more than one circuit.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-07-2007, 11:23 AM
rgustafson rgustafson is offline
Bowie
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 224
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SentToStud
I think the owner part of the combo is the most important factor. All the trainer , jock and jock/trainer percentage and ROI info is all very well organized and widely available and, in essence, is worked into the tote board. . The owner part of the equation is not but it's very important; to me, the most significantespecially in claiming races and at mid-level tracks. Formulator helps here if you use it but I tried it and it's cumbersome. It takes me a lot of time to track this and keep it current where I play but I think it's worthwhile. It's also a big reason I find it unwise to play more than one circuit.
Yes, I think we fans of Maggi Moss can attest to that
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-07-2007, 11:51 AM
dillon
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Hello, first time post. Whenever the racetrack is sloppy or muddy, no matter if it is Sar/Aqu/Bel, Gary Contessa seems to do extremely well. I personally look forward to those days and have cashed some nice tickets with this trainer.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 06-07-2007, 11:54 AM
Downthestretch55 Downthestretch55 is offline
Hialeah Park
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Stamford, NY
Posts: 4,618
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dillon
Hello, first time post. Whenever the racetrack is sloppy or muddy, no matter if it is Sar/Aqu/Bel, Gary Contessa seems to do extremely well. I personally look forward to those days and have cashed some nice tickets with this trainer.
Welcome Dillon.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 06-07-2007, 12:41 PM
philcski's Avatar
philcski philcski is offline
Goodwood
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Mission Viejo, CA
Posts: 8,872
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaHoss9698
Did Garcia and Contessa have a little falling out? He rode none of Contessa's horses yesterday and is named on none today.
Don't know but Channing Hill is on the WM/Contessa in the 1st on Belmont Day, normally I would think Garcia would get that mount.
__________________
please use generalizations and non-truths when arguing your side, thank you
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 06-07-2007, 12:46 PM
dillon
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Thanks, glad to be here.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.