Quote:
Originally Posted by taxicab
There's nothing disingenuous about the list or post.
I wasn't one of the horsemen who went rolling to the top to complain about the milkshaking.
And it's not my problem if certain trainers are cheating.....I'm not saddling the horses.
And if you have a beef with the article/report I suggest you take it up with the Paulick report.
The article points in a certain direction,and it's no concern of mine which direction the finger is pointing.
Horse racing is full of cheaters,always has been.......it's the nature of the beast.
|
The list is disingenuous because it provides NO context to the starters. Plenty of outfits get winners in the first halves of meets and dwindle later as horses run out of conditions. And your post is particularly disingenuous singling out 'Whitmore's last' when it came during the enhanced protocol period.. you know, negating your premise.
Milkshaking certainly was going on and some barns obviously have been shown up, which is good. But as usual with this line of attack, there's just innuendo and supposition.
(And you conveniently avoided any discussion of Whitmore's sequence of sprint starts which began in New York, a jurisdiction that's serious about it's testing.)