Quote:
Originally Posted by Calzone Lord
Considering the dirt race was only an 8 horse field -- and the shortest price dirt horse won the race at 6/1 ... what a great bargain that price was if you...
A.) You knew the dirt horses would get to the wire first, as they logically were supposed to do.
B.) Liked the clear-cut favorite in the dirt race, and thought he was a deserving favorite.
Assuming you came to those conclusions ... that race offered a tremendous betting opportunity.
Take the betting favorite (of the dirt horses) ...wheel him over the only other 7 dirt horses and you get...
Exacta: $462.20
Trifecta: $11,373.80
Superfecta: $1,591.53 for every 10-cents ($15,915.30 for a buck)
If you think about it, those are big exotic prices for a race with just an 8-horse field where the post time favorite won. The 5th choice finished 2nd. And the 6th choice finished 3rd.
Wasted opportunity, I guess. Race seemed so gimmicky and weird, that it was hard to trust what "Abt 8.5 furlongs on the Turf" actually meant in terms of gate placement.
|
At first I thought too for sure that the dirt horses had the advantage. However, early on in the wagering some of the turf horses were huge overlays and I also saw that the times were actually pretty competitive. Only took a shot in the race because it was such a fun gimmick.