Quote:
|
Originally Posted by randallscott35
God Oracle you're annoying sometimes. This guy doesn't speak for me. I can't control what these people say. What a stupid example of trying to prove your point.
|
As are you Randall.
My point was that so many are using the raw time as a basis when the raw time was obviously a function of the track surface.
Talk about his ease in winning, the gears he showed, that he beat a decent(if small) field.
But the minute the 3rd race was over today, the odds on a sub 1:33 mile were 2-5.
Its my whole point, and I don't think a difficult one to grasp.