Quote:
Originally Posted by Danzig
again, how is making insurance obtainable a way of transferring assets to someone else?
i mean, i think the law sucks, but i get why they did what they did. but use of force? transferring assets...tyrannical??
wow.
|
It is making insurance less obtainable for everyone who pays. It only make it more obtainable for those who do not pay. That is a transfer of wealth. The recipient recieves and the provider pays for himself and the recipient. That is basically a transaction.
If someone's insurance goes from $400 a month to $950 a month, and they did not get $550 more in insurance or useful services, then they got ripped off. In this case the money went to pay the bill for the guy getting the freebies.
There is no free lunch and never will be, no matter how much the liberals cry.