Quote:
Originally Posted by joeydb
Unfortunately for the libs, it's apparent that Palin would have done a better job than Obama. In fact, it's hard for anyone to do a worse job.
|
it is? how is it apparent? what would she have done differently with everything that has occurred during his term plus one year?
when i consider everything palin has done over the time since she first hit the national scene, what is apparent to me is that mccain and his people didn't perform due diligence before selecting her, that she is a lightweight who thinks her lack of intelligence and knowledge is somehow a positive. she has no clue regarding national policy, foreign policy, the government, etc. her interviews are hilarious, but certainly not events that engender confidence in any of her abilities.
am i happy with obama? hell no. i think he was a naive neophyte who has been smacked down in a brutal way with reality. would i prefer palin? not in a million years. romney either. christie shows promise, but with his moderate stances, he'll have a hard time getting the nomination.
you blaming obama for everything you don't like is not based in rational thought. i suggest you take a long look at your legislative body, especially the house, which has done NOTHING of substance-hell, they can't even pass a goddamn farm bill, which has been standard legislation for years.