Quote:
|
Originally Posted by SCUDSBROTHER
Why f'n bother? Look how you've attacked people on here for writing about that track condition.
|
Things like this make you lose all credibility. How am I, or anyone else supposed to take you seriously, when presenting Lehr's side of the story and thinking that there was no bias equals "attacking" people for writing about the track condition?
This is completely out of left field with no backing -- disagreeing with you does not equal attacking you. Either you are drunk (and therefore unable to make sense of anything I say) or just plain old unable to make sense of anything I say -- as those two options are the only possible ways one could construe anything I've said as an "attack". I'll assume the former so that in the future I can try to take you seriously again.
Sorry, in retrospect, my sarcasm will likely be construed as an attack and I am going to go down in history as the board's biggest "attacker!"