[somerfrost]

Originally Posted by kentuckyrosesinmay

Well, I would place my mathematical and analytical skills above most people, including men, so I never have to pull out the calculator to do simple computations. I have received above a 100 average in every one of my mathematical courses in college so far. However, I still have to take Stat and Cal. What fun

I never buy anything that I don't A) extremely desire or B) need.

The third one is true for me. I am a pretty girl in ever sense of the word. I like to look good and dress up. However, I also like to get down and dirty with the horses. I do it well both ways.

Not true for me although I always have the last and final word when I know that I am right (as have facts). Most people normally give up when arguing with me when I know that I am right because I don't back down. However, I do usually realize when I am not right and will change my opinion or back down accordingly and apologetically.

I have a cat, and I love him dearly.

Not true. The only thing that I need a man for is sex, and to give me children. Other than that, I don’t depend on a man for anything and I never will. That is a lesson I learned early in life. I am worried about my career, but not my future with a man.

I only get dressed up when I go out in the evenings to party. I wear baggy pants and T-shirts and a hat to college. I dress in old clothes to go to the barn. I dress down way more than I dress up.

I will probably make more money than my future husband (if I’m crazy enough to ever have one). Nah, I am crazy enough. I like being with a man. It would be a plus if he made more money than me because I plan on making six figures, and it would be nice to have enough money to own racehorses. Oh yes, and the man that I do marry has to love horses and racehorses as much as I do. Well, that eliminates most of the men on this earth right then and there. LOL.

Well, I could write a book here...much of my graduate training revolved around IQ testing etc...here's the thing, as we said in the 60's while we marched through southern cities...it may be intellectually interesting to compare groups of people but there are always more exceptions than those who fit neatly into any definition or description...the differences in groups are rather insignificant when compared to individual differences...if you conclude one sex (or race or other descriptive grouping) is more or less intelligent than another...of what use is that? I mean really...we think of folks who are somehow "challenged" but then along comes a Helen Keller or Stephen Hawking and our entire thesis gets blown to hell!