Quote:
Originally Posted by Riot
 Are you just not intelligent enough to understand the information on the site? It has nothing to do with Huffington Post. There is no need to follow any link to any media site (of which many are listed)
Seriously - are you drunk right now?
Other than the three times I did explain it, including linking to your own Rasmussen site to illustration what I said about trending, I again have to ask,
Seriously - are you drunk right now? Or just not able to follow this conversation? |
Seriously, are you Drunk? You cited this post:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Riot
As of today, Obama is ahead in all the swing states but North Carolina. Look at Rupert's anonymous data, it even agrees - but unlike Nate Silver, it colors North Carolina as going blue for Obama. That means Obama would sweep all the swings, and the Ipsos/Reuters Obama electoral landslide would happen.
Obama only has to win 2 out of 3 of Ohio, Florida, Colorado to win. Romney could take all the rest of the swings, but Obama would still win.
Romney has to win all three of OH, FL, and Colorado, plus nearly run the table on the rest (the other 5)
Here is Nate Silvers aggregate of national and state polling as of midnight, tonight (including todays polling)
 |
Then said that your Miami/Dade results, which are always Left, and ONLY REPRESENT 50,000 MIAMI DADE RESULTS (out of a state of TEN MILLION) disproved it.
Hows about this, go to your site,
http://elections.gmu.edu/early_vote_2012.html
Clicky (your word) on the first link they show you (gmu.edu isn't biased in anyway):
and tell us where it takes you - put down your drink first.{{SPOILER ALERT}} It's a Huff Po blog
Then tell us where the subsequent blog posts (which are the most important part of the site, as they are the first and only thing that you see) takes you.
Fraud.