View Single Post
  #6  
Old 09-24-2012, 04:51 PM
dellinger63's Avatar
dellinger63 dellinger63 is offline
Keeneland
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 10,072
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Danzig View Post
now, that's funny.


here's another issue. used to be that schools did their best to provide a decent meal at lunch, because for too many kids, they don't eat meals away from school.
so, take a kid who gets breakfast and lunch at school, and no dinner, and tell me what the lowered calories at his two meals will mean?
^^^^Ignoring the fact Mackwonago WI is not a poor community.

It would be nice if parents who are not poor would pack lunches for their own kids instead of piggybacking on their neighbors in the form of property taxes. In other words pay for your own shiat! If you can't afford children for God's sake don't have them. Grow up!

And to think this was a republican idea to serve unlimited calories probably in some misguided attack on Mrs. Socialist's ideas is sickening.
Reply With Quote